“Don’t worry, it’s not true” you claimed against the initial claim. So you gave a stance. And I gave you a citation.

You asked for a citation not a link…

I gave you two in APA format

There is a clear overall increase in infant and maternity rates post Roe. There is also an increase in abortions overall (I didn’t cite a source since this kind of raw data is easy to find). So your pro life stance is inherently stupid.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Maternal mortality rates in the United States, 2021.

Singh, P., & Gallo, M. F. (2024, October 21). U.S. infant mortality increased 7% in months following Dobbs. Ohio State News.

I didn’t say they were. I said the idea of it derives from socialism. Nordic countries contain a lot of socialist programs but aren’t socialist states, they’re capitalist states.

The funny thing is that it’s literally in the name “socialism” as in social. Social programs derive from socialism.

You don’t even have to agree with socialism entirely but the least you have to do is acknowledge where a lot of subsidies programs you rely on come from.

You do know what critical research is right?

After Roe V Wade got overturned the total number of abortions actually increased. Infant mortality rates also increased (CDC) bcs unsafe pregnancies had to come to term leading to birth defects and maternal mortality rates also increased (TCF).

Nothing is disqualifying if you’re a Trump boot licker

Fetal people? A fetus doesn’t have personhood, it literally doesn’t qualify to be one. Therefore, it shouldn’t be afforded any legal or moral consideration that persons are granted

Murdered isn’t the correct term to use bcs it’s contingent on legal context. You’re just morally charging your statement bcs you don’t know anything about this issue

Citation?

Shows how important education is. Red states are literally welfare states yet they voted against their own interests.