Sébastien Jean
@sebastienfmjean.bsky.social
Professor of Economics, Cnam Univ. Paris.
Geoeconomics and Geofinance, IFRI @ifri.bsky.social.
Member, CAE (French Council of Econ Advisers).
Geoeconomics and Geofinance, IFRI @ifri.bsky.social.
Member, CAE (French Council of Econ Advisers).
Reposted by Sébastien Jean
11.
🇨🇳 “EU-China Economic Relations and Global Imbalances” par @sebastienfmjean.bsky.social , Isabelle Méjean, and @schularick.bsky.social
Lire : urlr.me/f4xzUt
🇨🇳 “EU-China Economic Relations and Global Imbalances” par @sebastienfmjean.bsky.social , Isabelle Méjean, and @schularick.bsky.social
Lire : urlr.me/f4xzUt
Relations économiques entre la Chine et l'UE et déséquilibres mondiaux
Pour répondre à l’ascension industrielle de la Chine sans compromettre l’intégration économique ni la souveraineté, les recommandations du Conseil franco-allemand des experts économiques
urlr.me
August 29, 2025 at 8:59 AM
11.
🇨🇳 “EU-China Economic Relations and Global Imbalances” par @sebastienfmjean.bsky.social , Isabelle Méjean, and @schularick.bsky.social
Lire : urlr.me/f4xzUt
🇨🇳 “EU-China Economic Relations and Global Imbalances” par @sebastienfmjean.bsky.social , Isabelle Méjean, and @schularick.bsky.social
Lire : urlr.me/f4xzUt
You can certainly try to play with the rules, but exporters are supposed to certify origin. And it was deemed meaningful enough, for instance, for TRQs following S232 on steel-alu to be set at the MS level, not for the EU as a whole (see e.g. www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/co...)
www.bis.doc.gov
January 10, 2025 at 9:46 AM
You can certainly try to play with the rules, but exporters are supposed to certify origin. And it was deemed meaningful enough, for instance, for TRQs following S232 on steel-alu to be set at the MS level, not for the EU as a whole (see e.g. www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/co...)
Indeed. The EU applies à common trade policy, so EU imports are treated the same in all MSs.
But the reverse needs not be true: importing partners can treat MSs differently, not in MFN (by def) nor FTAs, but it is often the case with trade defense instruments.
But the reverse needs not be true: importing partners can treat MSs differently, not in MFN (by def) nor FTAs, but it is often the case with trade defense instruments.
January 9, 2025 at 10:42 PM
Indeed. The EU applies à common trade policy, so EU imports are treated the same in all MSs.
But the reverse needs not be true: importing partners can treat MSs differently, not in MFN (by def) nor FTAs, but it is often the case with trade defense instruments.
But the reverse needs not be true: importing partners can treat MSs differently, not in MFN (by def) nor FTAs, but it is often the case with trade defense instruments.
Competing industrial policies?
Well… If there was any competition, the winner seems rather clear: Chinese surplus in manuf goods trade is now 11% of the world total manuf trade, with coverage ratio increasing in all main branches.
Well… If there was any competition, the winner seems rather clear: Chinese surplus in manuf goods trade is now 11% of the world total manuf trade, with coverage ratio increasing in all main branches.
December 23, 2024 at 4:24 PM
Competing industrial policies?
Well… If there was any competition, the winner seems rather clear: Chinese surplus in manuf goods trade is now 11% of the world total manuf trade, with coverage ratio increasing in all main branches.
Well… If there was any competition, the winner seems rather clear: Chinese surplus in manuf goods trade is now 11% of the world total manuf trade, with coverage ratio increasing in all main branches.