Sebastian Block
banner
sebastianjblock.bsky.social
Sebastian Block
@sebastianjblock.bsky.social
Postdoc LMU Munich| Computational Social Science | Text-as-Data | Research Methods
Finding #2:
- Geographic appeals are more frequent when councils are elected via electoral districts (institutional incentives matter)
August 26, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Finding #1:
- Parties talk more about districts where they’re electorally strong --> this is especially pronounced when their voter base is localized
August 26, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Data & Method:
- 12 large German cities, one full term (5–6 yrs).
- We analyze 10,189 questions (aggregated to parties).
- We build 455 district dictionaries from Wikipedia + OpenStreetMap (streets, sights, buildings, etc.), matched to district shapefiles, to detect when/where questions target geo
August 26, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Ask: Do neighborhoods actually receive attention & representation in local politics?

Did: Computational (geo)text on council questions with geocoded place refs

Find: Geographic representation is common; parties focus where they’re strongest with localized electorates & certain electoral rules
August 26, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Reposted by Sebastian Block
@martingross.bsky.social @donyhu.bsky.social @sebastianjblock.bsky.social & @jvelimsky.bsky.social deal with issue emphasis

💡Key findings:
1️⃣More attention to issues where municipalities have more legal leeway
2️⃣Effect is moderated by municipalities' financial constraints

doi.org/10.1111/spsr...
The Impact of Institutional and Financial Constraints on Party Behaviour in Local Politics
Political parties are not free to choose which issues to focus on in parliament. At the national level, it is mostly economic and societal problem pressures which impact parties' issue attention. In ...
doi.org
June 12, 2025 at 9:48 AM
These dynamics matter not only for understanding local governance in Germany, but also for broader debates about the role of technocrats in democratic systems and how accountability mechanisms adapt to non-partisan actors.
April 15, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Why?
Independent ministers—while often chosen for expertise—are less predictable. Parties cannot rely on shared ideology or party loyalty, which increases the risk of policy drift. Parliamentary questions help close this informational gap.
April 15, 2025 at 11:53 AM
The findings are clear:
✅ All parties ask significantly more questions to independent portfolios than to partisan ones.
✅ Opposition parties exercise even more oversight than governing parties over independent portfolios
April 15, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Using data from 28 German city councils (2011–2020) and over 13,000 parliamentary questions, I examine whether parties control independent portfolio heads more than partisan ones—and whether opposition and governing parties behave differently.
April 15, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Despite the increasing presence of independents in both national and subnational governments, research has largely focused on partisan ministers. My article addresses this gap by studying how parties control independent portfolios.
April 15, 2025 at 11:53 AM
In many governments, independent ministers are appointed to key portfolios. Unlike partisan ministers, they aren’t bound by party discipline—raising important questions about oversight: Who monitors them, and how does this shape legislative control dynamics?
April 15, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Please add me to the CSS list:) thanks!
November 20, 2024 at 4:41 PM
Thank you!
November 9, 2023 at 8:39 PM
Thank you, Clint!
November 9, 2023 at 1:49 PM