Stephen Dotts
@sdotts.bsky.social
Attorney in Pennsylvania. Steelers, Penguins, Phillies, and Sixers fan. I enjoy movies and politics/history. Former HS wrestling coach.
This is the POTUS gleefully admitting he is violating a prominent critic’s 1st Amendment rights and the Constitution for personal profit. Again.
If Americans saw this in another country then they would wisely conclude that, if about half the country is ok with this, there is serious trouble ahead.
If Americans saw this in another country then they would wisely conclude that, if about half the country is ok with this, there is serious trouble ahead.
September 24, 2025 at 12:28 PM
This is the POTUS gleefully admitting he is violating a prominent critic’s 1st Amendment rights and the Constitution for personal profit. Again.
If Americans saw this in another country then they would wisely conclude that, if about half the country is ok with this, there is serious trouble ahead.
If Americans saw this in another country then they would wisely conclude that, if about half the country is ok with this, there is serious trouble ahead.
Does anyone know how I can join “Antifa” and where I can send my funding?
September 18, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Does anyone know how I can join “Antifa” and where I can send my funding?
Nothing could make me want to join and fund Antifa- as if that were actually a singular, cohesive organization- more than this tweet:
September 18, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Nothing could make me want to join and fund Antifa- as if that were actually a singular, cohesive organization- more than this tweet:
Here’s an example of just one of the other problems with masked and plainclothes ICE Agents acting with impunity. It happened close to where I live and is genuinely frightening:
July 2, 2025 at 1:40 AM
Here’s an example of just one of the other problems with masked and plainclothes ICE Agents acting with impunity. It happened close to where I live and is genuinely frightening:
On 6/28/25 2 men impersonating ICE Officers committed a violent armed robbery in Milton, DE. The widely reported tactics utilized by plainclothes ICE Officers render Delaware’s otherwise very reasonable Public Safety Advisory regarding traffic stops insufficient and dangerous. #ICE #Trump #Delaware
July 2, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Actually, for the first time in 20 years, the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency declared that Iran had run afoul of its obligations on June 12, 2025- namely by enriching hundreds of kgs of uranium to near-weapons-grade levels.
June 18, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Actually, for the first time in 20 years, the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency declared that Iran had run afoul of its obligations on June 12, 2025- namely by enriching hundreds of kgs of uranium to near-weapons-grade levels.
Again, the IAEA and nuclear experts say there is no civilian application for hundreds of kgs of 60% enriched Uranium.
I do not support Israel’s wars and think forcible regime change in Iran would be a disaster, but Iran’s enrichment program has 1 logical conclusion- many more nukes in Middle East
I do not support Israel’s wars and think forcible regime change in Iran would be a disaster, but Iran’s enrichment program has 1 logical conclusion- many more nukes in Middle East
June 18, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Again, the IAEA and nuclear experts say there is no civilian application for hundreds of kgs of 60% enriched Uranium.
I do not support Israel’s wars and think forcible regime change in Iran would be a disaster, but Iran’s enrichment program has 1 logical conclusion- many more nukes in Middle East
I do not support Israel’s wars and think forcible regime change in Iran would be a disaster, but Iran’s enrichment program has 1 logical conclusion- many more nukes in Middle East
The report mentions enrichment of uranium 235 to 60%, which has no civilian application. Here is the non-partisan, non-profit Institute for Science and International Security’s analysis of the IAEA Report:
isis-online.org/isis-reports...
isis-online.org/isis-reports...
June 17, 2025 at 11:04 PM
The report mentions enrichment of uranium 235 to 60%, which has no civilian application. Here is the non-partisan, non-profit Institute for Science and International Security’s analysis of the IAEA Report:
isis-online.org/isis-reports...
isis-online.org/isis-reports...
June 6, 2025 at 8:05 PM
At a preliminary hearing I cross-examined a member of PETA who accused my client of animal cruelty for working at a slaughterhouse, but the judge didn’t let it get too far…
May 8, 2025 at 12:31 PM
At a preliminary hearing I cross-examined a member of PETA who accused my client of animal cruelty for working at a slaughterhouse, but the judge didn’t let it get too far…
What hell is wrong with Marco Rubio’s soul?
That was obviously a rhetorical question…
That was obviously a rhetorical question…
April 30, 2025 at 10:05 PM
What hell is wrong with Marco Rubio’s soul?
That was obviously a rhetorical question…
That was obviously a rhetorical question…
Imagine being the kind of person who gleefully admits he’s choosing to violate a 9-0 Supreme Court ruling by refusing to make a single phone call to help a person who is wrongfully imprisoned in a brutal prison camp:
April 30, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Imagine being the kind of person who gleefully admits he’s choosing to violate a 9-0 Supreme Court ruling by refusing to make a single phone call to help a person who is wrongfully imprisoned in a brutal prison camp:
It should be the top news story around the globe when the US President announces that the US Constitution is too much of an inconvenience to abide by it.
April 27, 2025 at 1:16 AM
It should be the top news story around the globe when the US President announces that the US Constitution is too much of an inconvenience to abide by it.
You said “when he shows out” not “if he shows out”.
If you meant to say “if” and “then” and not “when” then fine, but that’s not what you wrote.
Regardless, there’s no evidence to support the conclusion that reports of Sanders doing badly in interviews were based on fear of dad.
If you meant to say “if” and “then” and not “when” then fine, but that’s not what you wrote.
Regardless, there’s no evidence to support the conclusion that reports of Sanders doing badly in interviews were based on fear of dad.
April 26, 2025 at 5:17 AM
You said “when he shows out” not “if he shows out”.
If you meant to say “if” and “then” and not “when” then fine, but that’s not what you wrote.
Regardless, there’s no evidence to support the conclusion that reports of Sanders doing badly in interviews were based on fear of dad.
If you meant to say “if” and “then” and not “when” then fine, but that’s not what you wrote.
Regardless, there’s no evidence to support the conclusion that reports of Sanders doing badly in interviews were based on fear of dad.
Here is a really good summary of all the differing opinions on Sanders that includes all sorts of criticisms/concerns about his ability to go through progressions, arm strength, sacks, concerns about his dad, bad interviews, etc.
It was published by the NFL on 4/22
www.nfl.com/news/2025-nf...
It was published by the NFL on 4/22
www.nfl.com/news/2025-nf...
April 26, 2025 at 5:08 AM
Here is a really good summary of all the differing opinions on Sanders that includes all sorts of criticisms/concerns about his ability to go through progressions, arm strength, sacks, concerns about his dad, bad interviews, etc.
It was published by the NFL on 4/22
www.nfl.com/news/2025-nf...
It was published by the NFL on 4/22
www.nfl.com/news/2025-nf...
It 100% has to do with his arrogance and making bad reads on defenses presented to him during interviews. At least, that is what has been reported by The Athletic:
April 26, 2025 at 3:30 AM
It 100% has to do with his arrogance and making bad reads on defenses presented to him during interviews. At least, that is what has been reported by The Athletic:
No, insufferable because he showed arrogance while making the wrong decisions in given hypotheticals.
I’m not just making that up, I subscribe to The Athletic and that’s what has been reported:
I’m not just making that up, I subscribe to The Athletic and that’s what has been reported:
April 26, 2025 at 3:23 AM
No, insufferable because he showed arrogance while making the wrong decisions in given hypotheticals.
I’m not just making that up, I subscribe to The Athletic and that’s what has been reported:
I’m not just making that up, I subscribe to The Athletic and that’s what has been reported:
Do you think, when Trump was sending this, he was thinking “it’s too bad Goebbels killed himself”?
April 22, 2025 at 1:43 PM
Do you think, when Trump was sending this, he was thinking “it’s too bad Goebbels killed himself”?
I’d suggest something similar to this classic:
April 17, 2025 at 8:33 PM
I’d suggest something similar to this classic:
True. But that’s not what happened in Rumsfeld v Padilla which is probably the most relevant case to Khalil’s circumstances. In that case SCOTUS remanded the case for dismissal:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumsfel...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumsfel...
March 12, 2025 at 4:31 PM
True. But that’s not what happened in Rumsfeld v Padilla which is probably the most relevant case to Khalil’s circumstances. In that case SCOTUS remanded the case for dismissal:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumsfel...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumsfel...