I freelance as an ML engineer and am currently: open for new part time contracts.
We can all agree that current methods are not sufficient.
We can all agree that current methods are not sufficient.
If we could have solved IMO with symbolic methods we would have solved IMO with symbolic methods. We couldn’t because math requires reasoning.
If we could have solved IMO with symbolic methods we would have solved IMO with symbolic methods. We couldn’t because math requires reasoning.
Sortera din tvätt >->
Sortera din tvätt >->
Doing so without becoming either catatonic from having nothing to drive you or paralyzed from overthinking is the core ability that meat has and computers struggle with, but will achieve relatively soon.
Doing so without becoming either catatonic from having nothing to drive you or paralyzed from overthinking is the core ability that meat has and computers struggle with, but will achieve relatively soon.
Don’t hesitate to say obviously true things like 1+1=2 or gravity exists and roughly obeys newton’s law of gravitation.
Don’t hesitate to say obviously true things like 1+1=2 or gravity exists and roughly obeys newton’s law of gravitation.
If you are worried about the social norms you can just praise them in general and recommend them for promotion instead of phrasing it as a request.
If you are worried about the social norms you can just praise them in general and recommend them for promotion instead of phrasing it as a request.
The 1% is that people with access to scale don’t want to make a mind, they want to make a product, and the people without access to scale are human chauvinists.
We’ll unwittingly make an artificial mind by 2030.
The 1% is that people with access to scale don’t want to make a mind, they want to make a product, and the people without access to scale are human chauvinists.
We’ll unwittingly make an artificial mind by 2030.