Stephanie Christine Winkler
@scwinkler.bsky.social
International Postdoc @stockholm-uni.bsky.social. Interested in IR, analogies, the Cold War, concepts, China, Japan, US, power shift, soft power
Currently a guest researcher at Goethe University Frankfurt!
Currently a guest researcher at Goethe University Frankfurt!
Kindly funded by Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
September 5, 2025 at 11:25 AM
Kindly funded by Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Co-organized with Zeno Leonie (@kingscollegelondon.bsky.socia) & Vassily Klimentov (University of Zurich)
September 5, 2025 at 11:09 AM
Co-organized with Zeno Leonie (@kingscollegelondon.bsky.socia) & Vassily Klimentov (University of Zurich)
Sure is! So cool you remembered the ISA talk (and mentioned it in the elevator, haha)
August 20, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Sure is! So cool you remembered the ISA talk (and mentioned it in the elevator, haha)
Check out the other articles in this great special section on "Making Sense of the US-China Tech War" with @profbode.bsky.social, @nikeretzmann.bsky.social and others
academic.oup.com/isagsq/artic...
(4/4)
academic.oup.com/isagsq/artic...
(4/4)
academic.oup.com
April 28, 2025 at 8:01 AM
Check out the other articles in this great special section on "Making Sense of the US-China Tech War" with @profbode.bsky.social, @nikeretzmann.bsky.social and others
academic.oup.com/isagsq/artic...
(4/4)
academic.oup.com/isagsq/artic...
(4/4)
The tech war is not just any arena of bilateral competition; it’s about how societies imagine themselves and their futures.
We need a more nuanced view of tech’s cultural, social, and political role in great power rivalry.
(3/4)
We need a more nuanced view of tech’s cultural, social, and political role in great power rivalry.
(3/4)
April 28, 2025 at 8:01 AM
The tech war is not just any arena of bilateral competition; it’s about how societies imagine themselves and their futures.
We need a more nuanced view of tech’s cultural, social, and political role in great power rivalry.
(3/4)
We need a more nuanced view of tech’s cultural, social, and political role in great power rivalry.
(3/4)
I show how "sociotechnical imaginaries"—shared visions of past, present, and future and technologies' role in it—shape U.S. discourse, linking tech’s risks to rivals to justify a security-driven agenda.
(2/4)
(2/4)
April 28, 2025 at 8:01 AM
I show how "sociotechnical imaginaries"—shared visions of past, present, and future and technologies' role in it—shape U.S. discourse, linking tech’s risks to rivals to justify a security-driven agenda.
(2/4)
(2/4)
I'm going with Billy Mattern's "Why `Soft Power' Isn't So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics" from 2005! Brilliant article!
March 3, 2025 at 8:24 PM
I'm going with Billy Mattern's "Why `Soft Power' Isn't So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics" from 2005! Brilliant article!