Also, forced FOS expression rescued some of the downstream transcriptional programs and partially restored inflammatory fitness
Also, forced FOS expression rescued some of the downstream transcriptional programs and partially restored inflammatory fitness
We analyzed expression of the major AP-1 members and noticed that FOS and its paralogs were consistently downregulated in all our experimental models
We analyzed expression of the major AP-1 members and noticed that FOS and its paralogs were consistently downregulated in all our experimental models
ChIP-seq of both isoforms showed similar binding on inflammatory genes. Was there something else?
ChIP-seq of both isoforms showed similar binding on inflammatory genes. Was there something else?
And when we reintroduced p42 into mutant AML cells, it partially rescued inflammatory gene expression.
And when we reintroduced p42 into mutant AML cells, it partially rescued inflammatory gene expression.
But what are the transcriptional consequences of expressing p30 instead of p42?
But what are the transcriptional consequences of expressing p30 instead of p42?