Besides, why should I respect a revolutionary tendency that has an equal history of trying to sabotage other more powerful revolutionary tendencies? If I saw that anarchism was about to destroy capitalism, I would humbly get out of the way. Anarchists don't reciprocate that.

Denouncing anarchism is just red meat for maga cultists. They don't even know or care what anarchism is, this is them virtue signaling to their political base. If anarchists actually faced mass execution as you initially claimed that would be horrific and disgusting and I would be in the streets.

Ok, no offense, but I don't care about your conscience. The only thing that matters is political development in our shared reality.

Yes, this supports my point. They appreciate the existence of anarchism to have a convenient enemy. I'm sure that when you say this you don't mean to imply that all their rhetoric against immigrants, muslims, ethnic minorities, Venezuala, etc, are actually justified. It's the same with anarchism.

Anarchism serves as a useful release valve that channels discontent in an insignificant way. It's an acceptable loss to them. They don't fear you or respect you as an adversary AT ALL.

No they wouldn't. The CIA would love more people to be anarchists.

Chomsky’s reaction to questions on the relationship to JE were cartoonishly suspicious, the excuse of studying power is patronizing, and there are many reasons to criticize his work as an anti-socialist. I agree with your points about the files but we don’t need Chomsky.

Slop.

Israel is well known for funding fake archaeology for propaganda purposes. So there’s no reason to respect your words.

But Christianity is entirely about human sacrifice.

Straight to the reeducation camp.

“Should life be worth living? Some say no.”