Scruffy Bearded Guy
banner
scruffybeardedguy.bsky.social
Scruffy Bearded Guy
@scruffybeardedguy.bsky.social
I like computers and other stuff.

my blog: https://scruffybeardedguy.org
Jason Schreier also has lots of clown moments under his belt, by using his "reputation". He is struggling to play robin hood on an industry that he is also part of it in terms of milking the cow.
August 21, 2025 at 7:47 PM
This is happening with everything involving history.
August 21, 2025 at 7:35 PM
This is quite interesting and I wasn't aware of his channel, thanks. I also do the same thing with other yt channels.
July 13, 2025 at 9:41 AM
Yes, this *exactly* why the game was crap... And yes I am being sarcastic.
June 20, 2025 at 6:54 PM
But do the mods belong to nexus ? I doubt that modders cannot upload them elsewhere although I never read the terms and conditions.
June 20, 2025 at 6:36 PM
This is my t-shirt as I am reading this.
June 20, 2025 at 6:31 PM
The forced interpretation (or representation) does not make things more charming necessarily though. Quite the contrary actually it can make things worse.

Also TW3 is an awesome empty world.
May 26, 2025 at 4:36 PM
For the beach I would bet anything that it was Ferrari. Oh well...
May 20, 2025 at 8:56 AM
For the beach I would say Mark Ferrari. For the circus tent maybe Purcell. Pirate ship, not certain (I am pretty much guessing now, Purcell?) And for the last one, I would again vote for Ferrari.
May 20, 2025 at 5:44 AM
There are individual images that you can track if you make a short research but for the whole thing it might take some time.
May 19, 2025 at 8:22 PM
The VGA transition was made by a guy (at least a good portion of it) which honestly I don't know his background well or remember his name.
May 19, 2025 at 6:51 PM
I agree with that and to be honest I can't remember which specific backgrounds where his on the EGA version. Maybe some close-ups that had this grainy feel.

Unpopular (I assume) opinion... I think mi1 VGA > EGA. So in my eyes the Loom effect didn't work as good here. Maybe I need to replay it.
May 19, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Ah... Then hit me and yes I will be honest. If you have an image as an example I will be very interested. I was actually bashing Purcell the other day with a friend of mine on how MI2 was looking worse by his art (well not all of it, some of it).
May 19, 2025 at 6:31 PM
What you do is, you're judging based on his ground work and what made you identify him in the first place. That is also what you are doing with Ferrari. This is how it works. You are *still* trying to get ahead (for some reason). In any case. Have a good one at work, I hope it's relaxing at least.
May 19, 2025 at 6:26 PM
You are still missing my point. You're taking for granted every single word and you're trying to bounce back and since I'm also bored let me re-explain. I don't need to explain that thematically every artists should use the same patterns in *every* work of his. This is obvious (so it "depends).
May 19, 2025 at 6:25 PM
No one is doubting that you know your stuff. Again, it feels like you're trying to get ahead in the conversation. Again, I was just chatting. No need for all that.
May 19, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Well I don't know, I think I've answered that already. Like with other pixel artists as well, it depends.
May 19, 2025 at 6:13 PM
I don't get the meaning of the question (is this a test?) but for example you take a look at living worlds vs Thimbleweed Park you cannot tell easily that the latter was made by Mark Ferarri.
May 19, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Like with every art form the identity is getting defined by patterns. If the artist decided to take a different route you might be surprised.
May 19, 2025 at 6:03 PM
It depends. I'll allow him to use a different non-distinguishable style. Like if I check my Mark Ferrari archive I am certain that I couldn't identify some of his pixel art as his, if I didn't knew thay were created by him.
May 19, 2025 at 5:58 PM
All good, I was just making discussion.
May 19, 2025 at 5:38 PM