I do this all the time when I help design, develop and deliver big projects.

Get my exact process:

www.thebigprojectcollective.com/p/to-do-mean...

Start with curiosity.

Then build up in an iterative manner your knowledge that is more like literacy than in depth knowledge.

There is one thing that makes it much easier to get high-powered people to collaborate.

Knowing something about their fields of expertise.

The challenge is learning something about all of those fields of expertise.

The Strive nonprofit in the US bringing together 300 community organizations

The Apollo moonshot.

More than 400,000 people involved.

There are many multi-party collaborations that have made stunning achievements.

Small and simple collaborations are just not that powerful.

Multi-party collaborations, while potentially much more powerful, are however constrained by collaboration’s evil step-sister, competition.

We are no where near knowing or understanding all the inputs that determine the difference between health and disease.

This would have to mean an across the board suspension of the need to validate anything with clinical trials.

It also assumes that will at some point be able to predict everything, which may not be the case every if we knew and understood all the inputs. 👇

Start by joining The Big Project Collective. www.thebigprojectcollective.com/p/big-projec...

See how this works:
www.thebigprojectcollective.com/p/to-be-conf...

If you are not pursuing a big project with an adaptive, iterative mindset good luck maintaining enthusiasm.
www.thebigprojectcollective.com/p/big-projec...

Here is what to do instead:
www.thebigprojectcollective.com/p/forget-abo...

The linking of listening for understanding and love is remarkable. It reminds me of the pressured, effervescent conversations between friends often late night at party when they start building on each others ideas.