But you said it was wrong in UK law. If the SC makes a ruling, that ruling cannot be wrong in UK law.

Sir this is not a cat

no, they haven't. I expect you've come up with some weird invented definition that means you can say that because people wear earrings or some other such spurious nonsense.

Meanwhile here's me, with decades of experience as a biologist knowing its nonsense and you're telling me to read a book 😆

"trust me bro!"

hmmmm.

What like the truth about biology and how humans can't change sex? That truth?

or is that different somehow?

You mean you buried the lede?

not a great look

religion has always been a part of the judiciary - Lord Mackay was sanctioned by his church (the Wee Frees) because he attended the Catholic funeral of Lord Wheatley

at this time, the judiciary is probably the free-est from religious influence at any point

It was a panel of five Supreme Court judges and it was a unanimous verdict.

Were they all living in the same district of Edinburgh as her?

That's just not factually correct. The polls are clear that as more people have learned the issues around the access of transwomen into female spaces, more people have rejected it.
The court decision is in line with public opinion

🥺🥺🥺

I got a gift sub for my parents years back; mum has been hinting recently i don't need to keep getting it just for her.

I keep getting it just for her.