Scott Franks
@scottfranks.bsky.social
Assistant Professor, Allard Law, University of British Columbia
The title is read two ways. First, the Court's theory of "reconciliation" threatens Indigenous peoples' visions for the future of their societies. Second, this article attempts to menace the Court's theory of "reconciliation".
January 28, 2025 at 1:07 AM
The title is read two ways. First, the Court's theory of "reconciliation" threatens Indigenous peoples' visions for the future of their societies. Second, this article attempts to menace the Court's theory of "reconciliation".
In this article, I contextualize the Court's jurisprudence on reconciliation from the enactment of s. 35 of the Constitution Act of 1982 through the constitutional and political crises of Indigenous-crown relations in the 1980s and early to mid 1990s.
January 28, 2025 at 1:07 AM
In this article, I contextualize the Court's jurisprudence on reconciliation from the enactment of s. 35 of the Constitution Act of 1982 through the constitutional and political crises of Indigenous-crown relations in the 1980s and early to mid 1990s.