Scott Abbey
@scottabbey.com
Math rendering on the web
While chatting with friends in Discord yesterday, the subject of Ohm's Law vs Watts came up, along with the question, "Why is current represented as an I in Ohm's Law, but we use Ato define Watts?" Well, the answer to the latter question is that in Ohm's Law: V = IR I…
While chatting with friends in Discord yesterday, the subject of Ohm's Law vs Watts came up, along with the question, "Why is current represented as an I in Ohm's Law, but we use Ato define Watts?" Well, the answer to the latter question is that in Ohm's Law: V = IR I…
Math rendering on the web
While chatting with friends in Discord yesterday, the subject of Ohm's Law vs Watts came up, along with the question, "Why is current represented as an I in Ohm's Law, but we use Ato define Watts?" Well, the answer to the latter question is that in Ohm's Law: V = IR I represents the French term for current intensité du courant, which translates literally to current intensity.
scottabbey.com
September 24, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Math rendering on the web
While chatting with friends in Discord yesterday, the subject of Ohm's Law vs Watts came up, along with the question, "Why is current represented as an I in Ohm's Law, but we use Ato define Watts?" Well, the answer to the latter question is that in Ohm's Law: V = IR I…
While chatting with friends in Discord yesterday, the subject of Ohm's Law vs Watts came up, along with the question, "Why is current represented as an I in Ohm's Law, but we use Ato define Watts?" Well, the answer to the latter question is that in Ohm's Law: V = IR I…
Reposted by Scott Abbey
How did I not know this existed until this very second
Here’s a visualization of all the curse words in real time, which is oddly satisfying:
swearsky.bagpuss.org
swearsky.bagpuss.org
SwearSky
Bluesky profanity, as it happens
swearsky.bagpuss.org
November 23, 2024 at 4:00 PM
How did I not know this existed until this very second