Chris Schatschneider
schotz.bsky.social
Chris Schatschneider
@schotz.bsky.social
Professor of Psychology at FSU. Methodologist. Interested in the development of reading skills. Native of Cleveland, Oh
Under Pressure duet. I thought the David Bowie parts would be easier to sing. They were not.
September 4, 2025 at 3:44 PM
OK. I guess I'll whip up some simulations to see how much violating the assumption of equilibrium and stationarity has on the model.
August 8, 2025 at 11:38 AM
I love springing this fact on the first year grad students in my class just to see their reaction.
August 7, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Genius. If I could convince people of the utility of Degrees of Non-Freedom I've got a number of under-identified models that I think would work great.
July 25, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Thanks Jens! I appreciate that.

It was a crazy surreal experience.
April 18, 2025 at 1:39 PM
Everything outside is just covered in a fine yellow blanket of allergens…
March 12, 2025 at 10:32 AM
I hope her neighbors are ashamed of themselves.
February 27, 2025 at 11:42 AM
My god - you’re living the dream!
February 9, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Well that’s weird?!
February 9, 2025 at 9:02 PM
Well the bottom picture makes it easier to see the light reflecting off the tubes from the top picture
December 20, 2024 at 1:01 AM
Are they even allowed to sell a house in that condition?!! Yikes
December 13, 2024 at 3:56 AM
Yes - just like this!
November 18, 2024 at 1:10 AM
I am here! I’ve been reading some pretty interesting discussions. But I think they could be improved with the occasional snark post :)
November 18, 2024 at 1:09 AM
Glad to hear I was a positive influence!
March 20, 2024 at 4:50 PM
Yea I worry about that too. How many researchers undervalue data and reporting accuracy? I don’t know but I’m guessing it’s way too many.
March 6, 2024 at 5:55 PM
Very cool!
January 3, 2024 at 8:23 PM
What I have done is gone to journals like PLOS where the data is shared (at least theoretically), found some articles that used ANOVA then I re-analyze the data and map it back to the paper
December 19, 2023 at 8:24 PM
I believe the problem is trying to disentangle growth from fluctuations from time point to time point due to the other variable. If something is at equilibrium it would mean we can disregard actual growth as a confound. At least that’s how I understand the issue.
November 13, 2023 at 3:42 PM