SchlenkR
schlenkr.bsky.social
SchlenkR
@schlenkr.bsky.social
https:/www.pxlclock.com

OSS dev | [ F#; JS; C#; TS ] | self-employed | you can hire me | Maker of #pxlclock

https://linktr.ee/SchlenkR
Good info - haven't thought about that (I usually trust myself :D ) - ok. Wer need to update the app for that...
November 11, 2025 at 7:25 AM
Great! Urs, if you don't mind: Could you use Chrome and check our pxlclock.com/setup, enter your Wifi, click connect and then: See if your clock appears in the list of devices? Then, you can cancel. Thanks ;)
Read More - PXL Clock
pxlclock.com
November 11, 2025 at 7:00 AM
Yes, this is a wonderful, almost hypnotic clock face :)

BTW, the app is officially available, and the latest clock SW version is 2025-11-09_16.08.11

Does your clock still pull updates if I may ask?
November 10, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Thanks dawe! One more helping hand on our way :)
November 8, 2025 at 8:36 AM
How comes such a feeling?
August 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM
I guess many C# focused developers understand Func<int, int[], int[]> very well - and that's it!

or

delegate int combine(int a, int[] b)

(although the names are just documentation, and not part of teh type's identity.)
August 21, 2025 at 12:46 PM
Please let me use line breaks instead of ; - so your is:

1 - any type T with trait (+): T * int -> U
2 - iterable of U, may be anything from 'maybe' to endless
3 - array of U
4 - T * iterable<U> -> array<U>

So interesting 😍
August 21, 2025 at 12:38 PM
go on ... ;)
August 21, 2025 at 12:33 PM
In JavaScript, it can't be 'anytime' - because it can't be 'compiletime' 😆 OH YEAH!

Anyway: Your reasoning -> rules: ;)

"If an element of type T is added to our element e,
Then e also has type T"

or

"If we know that an element e is in an array, and that has type T,
Then e also has type T"
August 21, 2025 at 12:32 PM
a hint for nr. 4: That's a function, right?
When we agree that a type should reflect 'what things are', can it be that a function is really of type 'int array' or 'int list'?
August 21, 2025 at 7:11 AM
...nr. 4: That's a function, right?
When we agree that a type should reflect 'what things are', could it be that a function is really of type 'int array'?
August 21, 2025 at 7:10 AM