scepticalPhil
@scepticalphil.com
Anti-misogyny.
Anti-Homophobia.
Separation of church & state.
Gender atheist.
Anti-Homophobia.
Separation of church & state.
Gender atheist.
Some ketchup. On the side.
December 10, 2024 at 10:50 PM
Some ketchup. On the side.
Looks like Bluesky already had blocklists.
No idea who this is, but I'm blocked
No idea who this is, but I'm blocked
November 16, 2024 at 11:25 PM
Looks like Bluesky already had blocklists.
No idea who this is, but I'm blocked
No idea who this is, but I'm blocked
It's unlikely that I will join this.
Having been a subscriber for a few years, I value what Substack does.
It's a shame you don't see how important it is to the internet, and to helping reduce the over-capitalised nature of the web in 2024.
Having been a subscriber for a few years, I value what Substack does.
It's a shame you don't see how important it is to the internet, and to helping reduce the over-capitalised nature of the web in 2024.
January 12, 2024 at 9:16 PM
It's unlikely that I will join this.
Having been a subscriber for a few years, I value what Substack does.
It's a shame you don't see how important it is to the internet, and to helping reduce the over-capitalised nature of the web in 2024.
Having been a subscriber for a few years, I value what Substack does.
It's a shame you don't see how important it is to the internet, and to helping reduce the over-capitalised nature of the web in 2024.
This is about blocking some content?
What content and what reasons are they proposing to block it? As a lawyer, it would be great to hear your perspective on this.
What content and what reasons are they proposing to block it? As a lawyer, it would be great to hear your perspective on this.
January 10, 2024 at 3:40 PM
This is about blocking some content?
What content and what reasons are they proposing to block it? As a lawyer, it would be great to hear your perspective on this.
What content and what reasons are they proposing to block it? As a lawyer, it would be great to hear your perspective on this.
So this isn't about pornography? It's about books that tell children they can change sex and other legally contentious content.
Anyway, I'm not British, I'm Irish.
Anyway, I'm not British, I'm Irish.
January 10, 2024 at 3:38 PM
So this isn't about pornography? It's about books that tell children they can change sex and other legally contentious content.
Anyway, I'm not British, I'm Irish.
Anyway, I'm not British, I'm Irish.
This case affirms the law protecting employees in their holding and manifestation of gender critical views and should be seen as a stark warning to employers not to embrace a culture war narrative that gender critical views are by definition transphobic.
January 10, 2024 at 2:41 PM
This case affirms the law protecting employees in their holding and manifestation of gender critical views and should be seen as a stark warning to employers not to embrace a culture war narrative that gender critical views are by definition transphobic.
Why does access to porn impact those who are lesbian, gay, bi, trans and plus?
Access to pornography primarily impacts young people, why is their sexual orientation or transgender status a factor on this?
Access to pornography primarily impacts young people, why is their sexual orientation or transgender status a factor on this?
January 10, 2024 at 2:38 PM
Why does access to porn impact those who are lesbian, gay, bi, trans and plus?
Access to pornography primarily impacts young people, why is their sexual orientation or transgender status a factor on this?
Access to pornography primarily impacts young people, why is their sexual orientation or transgender status a factor on this?
No they do accept women. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
September 11, 2023 at 11:18 AM
No they do accept women. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯