Eliza Bettinger
scalywager.bsky.social
Eliza Bettinger
@scalywager.bsky.social
libraries, privacy, surveillance, new york state, digital humanities, odd datasets, maps, indigenous-settler history of the northeast.
member, Library Freedom Project.
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
It is clear what we need. It is to re-communalise academic publishing. Its costs funding are met by learned societies and their funders; profits go back to research, as do the data it generates. Researchers repeatedly call for this. tinyurl.com/bdekus68rofits
Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration
tinyurl.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:41 AM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
Our libraries are cutting staff so that Elsevier can have its 32% profit margin
A staggering statistic: "North American researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3 billion in that year." What are we doing?
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing:

a 🧵 1/n

Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
November 14, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
Profits from scientific publishing are eye-watering, costing us billions. In ‘The Drain of Scientific Publishing’ (arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820), (building on ‘The Strain of Scientific Publishing’ doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327) we show how it is harmful – and unnecessary.
The Drain of Scientific Publishing
The domination of scientific publishing in the Global North by major commercial publishers is harmful to science. We need the most powerful members of the research community, funders, governments and ...
arxiv.org
November 12, 2025 at 11:41 AM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
Our friend Janneke Adema says that scholar-led publishers are not best seen as an alternative to the commercial publishing industry but instead as positioned against the marketised university. We can carve out space for good stuff without wasting effort trying to unseat commercial publishing.
I truly do not understand the urge, let alone desire, to migrate the existing legacy publications to some kind of open. That is not the paradigm shift! The paradigm shift is building on top of the other open infrastructures. Why sully the new with the old‽
November 13, 2025 at 7:20 AM
This is the Epstein reading that matters.
November 15, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
And how do we get there? First, stop working with commercial publishers to reform the system. We have had decades of failed attempts at reform in which the only constancy is publishers’ profits. We cannot continually try to reform a broken system.
November 12, 2025 at 11:41 AM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
Over the past months (and at least 11 versions!), I was lucky to work with 11 amazing colleagues on a call to action to reform academic publishing.

Not another declaration, but an appeal to our powerful friends, research funders & institutions, to Stop the Drain of Scientific Publishing. 1/n
November 13, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
I asked about this, and one of our excellent librarians discovered that in fact AI summaries/"Research Assistant" can be switched off at the level of the library. Something to request. support.proquest.com/s/article/Eb...
November 11, 2025 at 9:44 PM
My last RT goes for university administrators, too.
November 10, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
COMPLICITY NOT COWARDICE. COMPLICITY.
November 10, 2025 at 2:06 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
I don't think it's cowardice. I think that they are OK with what the GOP is doing. The sooner folks reconcile with this, the better.
November 10, 2025 at 12:17 AM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
I’m no great fan of the ACA.

I believe we should guarantee health care as a human right through a single-payer Medicare for All system.

But — at minimum — we cannot allow Republicans to destroy our already-broken system by doubling insurance premiums for 20 million Americans.
November 9, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Set aside the NYC election results this week. There were major D/Left wins all over the stare — including the Onondaga County legislature (home of Syracuse), which just flipped to majority D for the first time in 50 years!
So why in the WORLD are NY’s elected reps caving on this?
John Fetterman, Angus King, Maggie Hassan, Dick Durbin, Jon Ossoff, Jeanne Shaheen, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, Mark Warner, Cory Booker, and of course Chuck Schumer. Maybe others not top of mind. Not all responsible will publicly vote for the cave - that's not how this works.
November 9, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
The smartest thing a politician can do in 2026 is to come up with a bold plan for shoring up and EXPANDING public libraries. Call it Project 2050. It's a way to reintroduce the grammar of commoning and the commons to a new generation in a way they can easily grasp. Such low hanging fruit.
November 9, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
The Cornell AAUP chapter has consistently stated that any deal with the Trump administration would be strategically unwise and a betrayal of Cornell’s principles. This remains the case. At best, we can say that this deal could have been worse.

Read our full statement here:
Statement on Cornell’s agreement with federal government
The Cornell AAUP chapter has consistently stated that any deal with the Trump administration would be strategically unwise and a betrayal of Cornell’s principles. This remains the case. We ar…
aaup-cornell.org
November 7, 2025 at 11:24 PM
My heart breaks again.
November 7, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Yes, yes, yes!!!
I always say libraries are *tech organizations.* They have the potential to model the antithesis of the Silicon Valley tech organization, which is NOT the only way to be!
Digital doesn't have to be extractive, exploitative, *worse.*
What if we could work with our public libraries to create + sustain convivial infrastructures for local news, local 🎶, digital equity, and more? I wrote abt lots of communities that are doing this work, bldg networks of solidarity + resistance, modeling alternatives to extractive commercial systems.
I wrote about public libraries as spaces of civic solidarity, common knowledge, and public infrastructure — all endangered by commercial and federal saboteurs
November 5, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
Allowing AI on a course supposedly training students how to think is as useful as allowing mobility scooters on an exercise run. And the result for the long-term welfare of the participants will be much the same.
October 24, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
Commercial knowledge dissemination predicated on proprietary systems and logics sutures hierarchies across spaces, places, and peoples. All to serve hegemonic, capitalist, power fantasies. They are tools of and for oppression, not liberation.
October 14, 2025 at 9:39 AM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
🧵
OpenAI's rapid rush into education has been achieved by habituating users through training programs, institutional lock-ins, strategic marketing partnerships, and third party integrations that together are helping it become infrastructural to teaching and learning. It's going to be hard to get out.
September 26, 2025 at 10:58 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
Again, the public & parents about to send kids to colleges don't understand the scale of this threat & what it means for the quality & quantity of classes/degrees/etc, bc university leaders are totally MIA (bsky.app/profile/mcop...). Meanwhile, stuff everyone takes for granted is just disappearing:
We're sending out cancellation of FLAS (Foreign Language & Area Studies) fellowships to dozens of students today, bc Trump has illegally refused to disburse year 4 of our DoE grants. Congrats to everyone in the GOP who is laser-focused on 🇺🇸 national security & the threat of rising 🇨🇳 to 🇺🇸 hegemony.
Yes, we’re literally about to zero out funding for every Title VI area studies center at every university in the country, along with FLAS fellowship funding. A generation of human capital that feeds into our diplomatic & intelligence corps that will simply not exist. National security madness.
August 8, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Reposted by Eliza Bettinger
Again, you cannot unplug 1/4-1/5 of an R1 university's budget & expect the same quantity or quality of "things" on campus. The math simply doesn't work. And pretending it does & we can uphold our "core values," & not talking loudly & publicly about how it doesn't, is not a strategy. It's madness.
Here is UW - Madison's budget. Our <largest> funder is the federal government. 25%. It used to be the state. Either way, the university in its current form ceases to exist if these federal cuts really happen. But The. Public. Doesn't. Know. This. And our leaders are absent from the public debate.
August 8, 2025 at 6:41 PM
New reporting on those threats against Tompkins County (Ithaca) from the feds earlier this year. #twithaca
September 18, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Yessssssss.
Best description yet. Thank you for articulating that, @shannonmattern.bsky.social
Yet another demonstration that AI is not a labor-saving device; it merely displaces the cleanup and mitigation (in realms where care, caution, accuracy, etc., actually matter) onto other people
September 18, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Was talking to an actual machine learning scholar about this common phenom of researchers bringing us AI-generated fake citations for us to find for them. She was gob-smacked — “But why do they trust it so much?”
Reference librarian Eddie Kristan said lenders at the library where he works have been asking him to find books that don’t exist without realizing they were hallucinated by AI.

🔗 www.404media.co/librarians-a...
Librarians Are Being Asked to Find AI-Hallucinated Books
It’s a trippy time to have a library card.
www.404media.co
September 18, 2025 at 6:41 PM