Soren B. Scott
@sbscott.bsky.social
Assistant professor of chemistry at the University of Copenenhagen working for a faster green energy transition.
*2 If a heavily agricultural country like Denmark needs to import biomass, it is absolutely not scaleable. For the scientific concensus against forest biomass, read e.g. this short open lettersigned by 700+ researchers:
www.pfpi.net/wp-content/u...
www.pfpi.net/wp-content/u...
www.pfpi.net
May 27, 2025 at 6:07 AM
*2 If a heavily agricultural country like Denmark needs to import biomass, it is absolutely not scaleable. For the scientific concensus against forest biomass, read e.g. this short open lettersigned by 700+ researchers:
www.pfpi.net/wp-content/u...
www.pfpi.net/wp-content/u...
* The model they cite is here: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/534311584/Fakta_om_atomkraft_V2_FINAL.pdf
It involves 42 TWh of biomass energy in Denmark. The only type they name directly is biogas, but that's projected only 13 TWh in 2035.
It involves 42 TWh of biomass energy in Denmark. The only type they name directly is biogas, but that's projected only 13 TWh in 2035.
May 27, 2025 at 6:06 AM
* The model they cite is here: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/534311584/Fakta_om_atomkraft_V2_FINAL.pdf
It involves 42 TWh of biomass energy in Denmark. The only type they name directly is biogas, but that's projected only 13 TWh in 2035.
It involves 42 TWh of biomass energy in Denmark. The only type they name directly is biogas, but that's projected only 13 TWh in 2035.