(a)dalfaculty.bsky.social and those responding to/quoting their posts have come across my feed.

Contradiction is key. For change to happen, students must recognize that what they believed is incompatible with the correct view. If there’s no conflict, they may just absorb the new fact into the wrong framework.

Nice thing about this figure is unlike benchmarks on factuality or hallucinates eg FACTscore we dont know if the test questions reflected real world use. OpenAI basically gave us the stat we were wondering about (2) More info from system card cdn.openai.com/pdf/8124a3ce...

Thanks, yes! That aligns with what I was thinking.

Interesting idea. Managing the practical side would be challenging. The article mentions the challenges of ensuring fair grades and scheduling sessions, but a bigger challenge to me is the time it takes to grade such an assessment versus a written one, for example.

"They didn’t like hearing how their AI-generated submissions, in which they’d clearly felt some personal stake, amounted to a big bowl of bland, flavorless word salad."