Click back.
Click back.
Click.
Click.
This bit was in line with the main themes, but also stood out for additional/tangential reasons.
This bit was in line with the main themes, but also stood out for additional/tangential reasons.
CT cholangiography is a completely different scan from your usual contrast-enhanced CT… it uses a special contrast agent with hepatobiliary excretion, producing images like this one.
Closer to a HIDA or ERCP in many ways than a normal CT.
Image source PMID 18349445
CT cholangiography is a completely different scan from your usual contrast-enhanced CT… it uses a special contrast agent with hepatobiliary excretion, producing images like this one.
Closer to a HIDA or ERCP in many ways than a normal CT.
Image source PMID 18349445
This number might have come from a 2022 review on cholecystitis in JAMA, that includes the table below.
tinyurl.com/55yn3suk
This number might have come from a 2022 review on cholecystitis in JAMA, that includes the table below.
tinyurl.com/55yn3suk
Something I've always struggled with below. Appreciate any insights!
Something I've always struggled with below. Appreciate any insights!
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
Another benefit of IBCC: easier to fix typos!
Another benefit of IBCC: easier to fix typos!
The intervention is stopping aspirin in patients with chronic CAD (including stents >6 mo old) who take an oral anticoagulant.
The intervention is stopping aspirin in patients with chronic CAD (including stents >6 mo old) who take an oral anticoagulant.
But does anyone have good references for how sensitive a combination of normal bili + AST + K is for ruling out significant hemolysis?
But does anyone have good references for how sensitive a combination of normal bili + AST + K is for ruling out significant hemolysis?
Also 22.8 to 9.3 is a 59% decrease, not 41%. Probably an editing mishap, maybe original version was "it's 41% of what it was."
Also 22.8 to 9.3 is a 59% decrease, not 41%. Probably an editing mishap, maybe original version was "it's 41% of what it was."
Here's two other examples--each within the same patient--demonstrating potential effect of positioning / gravity in allowing an optimizing window. Obvi can't make someone prone, but rotating leftward, or sitting up and leaning forward, can do the trick
Here's two other examples--each within the same patient--demonstrating potential effect of positioning / gravity in allowing an optimizing window. Obvi can't make someone prone, but rotating leftward, or sitting up and leaning forward, can do the trick