sarahschoengart.bsky.social
@sarahschoengart.bsky.social
Lastly, our approach allows us to also quantify transboundary impacts of wealthy emitters. For example, the emissions of the wealthiest 10% of US Americans and Chinese each led to a. 2-3 fold increase in heat extremes across vulnerable regions. 5/
May 7, 2025 at 3:02 PM
These wealthy groups contributed much more to dangerous heat and drought events than the average person—up to 26 times more for the top 1% when it comes to extreme heat globally. And up to 17 times (top 1%) more to Amazon droughts. 4/
May 7, 2025 at 3:02 PM
The richest 10% of people worldwide contributed to about two-thirds of global warming since 1990, and the top 1% alone about one-fifth. If the entire world had emitted like the bottom 50%, there would have been minimal warming since 1990. Lot more in there (check out this figure) 👇
3/
May 7, 2025 at 3:02 PM
So what did we do? We combine wealth-based GHG inequality assessments from @wid.world and @lucaschancel.bsky.social with an emulator modelling framework to systematically attribute changes in global temperature and grid-cell-level climate extremes to emissions from different wealth groups. 2/
May 7, 2025 at 3:02 PM