I am also finishing an article that is hopefully not garbage, but your brilliant book is cited in it!

As I wrote this, I was like what sort of fucking historian are you, GO AND FIND OUT (even if it from the lies people tell in local newspapers)

ALLEGEDLY, it is so named because a thief hid some liquor in a pond there (!) and thus escaped EXECUTION

Yeah, I’m perfectly fine with no drinking, but the tone is, uh, something.

(This is new - like, we’ve always had expense guidelines but someone new appears to be writing them this year…)

Whoever is writing these policies lately really has it in for fun, or the appearance of fun, even if it’s free.

But long-term habituation to one user's perspective could also, uh, make them vulnerable to believing in the user's false beliefs, no?

context from interactions with the user, I would think — not a short window like a single chat.

(It would be neat if this also isn't a problem after all — hmm)

This opens up all kinds of questions about models and expertise and what trust means in a scientific context for me — e.g. the bigger challenge, I think, would be for a model to distinguish between someone with false beliefs and someone with access to more facts than they have. It would need a lot +

Ours always seem to disappear too!

I think some of it is probably exhaustion, too. A lot of us are very tired.

Haha, yes — wow, these bicycle illustrations are terrific!