Sanjit Nagi
@sanjitnagi.bsky.social
Historian of constitutional law, the Labour Party, and rights.
In UCKLA:
1. On reforming ECHR-HRA 1998 (chapter version forthcoming): ukconstitutionallaw.org/2025/07/02/s...
2. Article 1 Protocol 1 (Right to Property) poses to expropriation: ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/04/15/s...
3. New Labour's HRA 1998: ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/01/15/s...
1. On reforming ECHR-HRA 1998 (chapter version forthcoming): ukconstitutionallaw.org/2025/07/02/s...
2. Article 1 Protocol 1 (Right to Property) poses to expropriation: ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/04/15/s...
3. New Labour's HRA 1998: ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/01/15/s...
October 12, 2025 at 5:48 PM
In UCKLA:
1. On reforming ECHR-HRA 1998 (chapter version forthcoming): ukconstitutionallaw.org/2025/07/02/s...
2. Article 1 Protocol 1 (Right to Property) poses to expropriation: ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/04/15/s...
3. New Labour's HRA 1998: ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/01/15/s...
1. On reforming ECHR-HRA 1998 (chapter version forthcoming): ukconstitutionallaw.org/2025/07/02/s...
2. Article 1 Protocol 1 (Right to Property) poses to expropriation: ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/04/15/s...
3. New Labour's HRA 1998: ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/01/15/s...
In the journal Public Law:
“Broadening the debate: The Attlee Government, untrammelled sovereignty, and socialistic reasons for resisting the European Convention on Human Rights; 1949-1950”.
Copy available at: broadening-the-debate-the-attlee-government-untrammelled-sovere.tiiny.site
“Broadening the debate: The Attlee Government, untrammelled sovereignty, and socialistic reasons for resisting the European Convention on Human Rights; 1949-1950”.
Copy available at: broadening-the-debate-the-attlee-government-untrammelled-sovere.tiiny.site
October 12, 2025 at 5:42 PM
In the journal Public Law:
“Broadening the debate: The Attlee Government, untrammelled sovereignty, and socialistic reasons for resisting the European Convention on Human Rights; 1949-1950”.
Copy available at: broadening-the-debate-the-attlee-government-untrammelled-sovere.tiiny.site
“Broadening the debate: The Attlee Government, untrammelled sovereignty, and socialistic reasons for resisting the European Convention on Human Rights; 1949-1950”.
Copy available at: broadening-the-debate-the-attlee-government-untrammelled-sovere.tiiny.site
I've said this across on X already, but a very thoughtful piece and I appreciate the engagement with my own post!
October 9, 2025 at 2:31 PM
I've said this across on X already, but a very thoughtful piece and I appreciate the engagement with my own post!
Some key passages:
September 1, 2025 at 12:40 PM
Some key passages:
A really enjoyable and informative read, congratulations!
August 12, 2025 at 7:03 PM
A really enjoyable and informative read, congratulations!
An enjoyable read, George. Thank you for the engagement and the counterpoints. Despite not agreeing entirely, they are very useful and something to reflect on!
July 10, 2025 at 11:31 AM
An enjoyable read, George. Thank you for the engagement and the counterpoints. Despite not agreeing entirely, they are very useful and something to reflect on!
Thank you for the engagement with my post—I always appreciate hearing opposing views and arguments. All very valid points and things to think about on my side of the debate!
July 2, 2025 at 12:46 PM
Thank you for the engagement with my post—I always appreciate hearing opposing views and arguments. All very valid points and things to think about on my side of the debate!
That is because the idea of reform is not new and has an unsuccessful track record. More importantly, advocates of reform fail to understand the broader difficulties the ECHR-HRA 1998 poses for the British constitution and elected majority in Parliament’s control over domestic decision-making.
July 2, 2025 at 8:05 AM
That is because the idea of reform is not new and has an unsuccessful track record. More importantly, advocates of reform fail to understand the broader difficulties the ECHR-HRA 1998 poses for the British constitution and elected majority in Parliament’s control over domestic decision-making.