Excellent analysis from Prof Mark Elliott here:
publiclawforeveryone.com/2025/07/29/t...

Lord Leggatt, however, argued they did not go far enough. His fiery dissent evokes Liversidge v Anderson - a passionate defence of the Judiciary's role in defending fundamental rights (and, by extension, democracy) of the sort not seen since Miller v PM.

The majority re-stated the four-part proportionality test and gave a strong statement that ‘The public authority decides on the action it will take, and hence is the primary decision-maker; but the court makes its own assessment whether such action is proportionate, and hence lawful, or not.’

Thanks so much Sylvia!

Here is the excerpt from the report which *precisely* recommends criminal sanction. Senedd counsel confirmed this.

The story makes clear an administrative tribunal (along the lines of the ICDR Model) rec for MS. Guardian and Times reported in the same terms. www.theguardian.com/politics/202...