Do you mean sandwich board type signs?

The sign bylaw, section 13.8 outlines what is permitted.

api.ghdcdn.com/portmoody-ed...

Yes, that’s what it sounded like in the TNRD presentation from BC Assessment.

And apparently rail is up next.

The 2026 budget consultation survey (link in bio) is now underway, and your input really does shape what gets prioritized. You can find links to Council meetings, committee summaries, and the full newsletter here 👇
🔗 buff.ly/AxD5PVF

Thanks as always for staying engaged — it makes a difference.

Similarly, while I strongly support more seniors housing in Port Moody, I couldn’t support advancing the proposed project at the Kyle site to second reading because it didn’t meet our inclusionary zoning expectations.

At Council, I voted against changing the parkland designation at the former Moody Elementary site. Before moving forward with that kind of decision, we need clearer information and a more transparent process.

When you start looking at it like this, it’s very apparent how much land we use for vehicles.

Sometimes I think about how much public space we cede to cars - like how many homes could fit in the same area as an intersection.

We have geofenced parking - learning from others that did not…

Port Moody’s Lime e-scooter and e-bike share showed significant distance travelled in only 2 months ~13,000 km. Obvs that doesn’t include all the private bikes/scooters. Use of bike infrastructure is higher than we think.

We deserve access to the same revenue pool for essential services and infrastructure. I am advocating for the Province to share a little of the $1.4B they collected from gaming and share some of it with the very people who contributed to it.

It’s time for a fairer provincial model of gaming revenue sharing. Our communities should not be penalized just because a casino wasn’t placed within our boundaries (or residents chose not to have one).

It is unrealistic to think that all 162 municipalities could have a casino.