oh wait, I thought you were going to answer my question, in time.
Instead you side track. Yet again.
I’ll wait.
Instead you side track. Yet again.
I’ll wait.
April 21, 2025 at 8:38 PM
oh wait, I thought you were going to answer my question, in time.
Instead you side track. Yet again.
I’ll wait.
Instead you side track. Yet again.
I’ll wait.
Of course you do - when it’s convenient, and allegedly allows you to avoid backing up your claim.
Have some integrity.
Have some integrity.
April 21, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Of course you do - when it’s convenient, and allegedly allows you to avoid backing up your claim.
Have some integrity.
Have some integrity.
It’s okay to say you don’t know.
And it’s telling how you can be so forthright with your opinion of me but are reticent when asked to provide proof of your claim.
And it’s telling how you can be so forthright with your opinion of me but are reticent when asked to provide proof of your claim.
April 21, 2025 at 8:30 PM
It’s okay to say you don’t know.
And it’s telling how you can be so forthright with your opinion of me but are reticent when asked to provide proof of your claim.
And it’s telling how you can be so forthright with your opinion of me but are reticent when asked to provide proof of your claim.
Oh yeah, I am indeed amused.
But i know you won’t understand the irony.
But i know you won’t understand the irony.
April 21, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Oh yeah, I am indeed amused.
But i know you won’t understand the irony.
But i know you won’t understand the irony.
So you spend all this time replying to and with little quips but when an actual point of substance is raised you back away. I get it.
April 21, 2025 at 7:49 PM
So you spend all this time replying to and with little quips but when an actual point of substance is raised you back away. I get it.
Please can you tell me where and when I have stated I want the erasure of trans folk?
April 21, 2025 at 4:48 PM
Please can you tell me where and when I have stated I want the erasure of trans folk?
Wizards: they cast spells. I thought your little gif was a wizard casting spells.
Was it that difficult to understand given the context?
Was it that difficult to understand given the context?
April 21, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Wizards: they cast spells. I thought your little gif was a wizard casting spells.
Was it that difficult to understand given the context?
Was it that difficult to understand given the context?
I asked you to provide evidence on your assertions that you made.
That might help me understand.
But you provide no answers just hatred. And excuses.
All I can surmise is you don’t like being asked question or don’t like being challenged.
That might help me understand.
But you provide no answers just hatred. And excuses.
All I can surmise is you don’t like being asked question or don’t like being challenged.
April 21, 2025 at 8:53 AM
I asked you to provide evidence on your assertions that you made.
That might help me understand.
But you provide no answers just hatred. And excuses.
All I can surmise is you don’t like being asked question or don’t like being challenged.
That might help me understand.
But you provide no answers just hatred. And excuses.
All I can surmise is you don’t like being asked question or don’t like being challenged.
That’s your opinion.
And if were to say the same about you, would you be outraged?
Or is it okay to agree to disagree?
And if were to say the same about you, would you be outraged?
Or is it okay to agree to disagree?
April 21, 2025 at 8:41 AM
That’s your opinion.
And if were to say the same about you, would you be outraged?
Or is it okay to agree to disagree?
And if were to say the same about you, would you be outraged?
Or is it okay to agree to disagree?
And can you tell me where I state I hate people?
April 21, 2025 at 8:37 AM
And can you tell me where I state I hate people?
And where, just for an example, have I said, I don’t want someone to exist?
Because that would be appalling to wish that someone were not alive.
Because that would be appalling to wish that someone were not alive.
April 21, 2025 at 8:30 AM
And where, just for an example, have I said, I don’t want someone to exist?
Because that would be appalling to wish that someone were not alive.
Because that would be appalling to wish that someone were not alive.
And what rights are being cast?
April 21, 2025 at 8:28 AM
And what rights are being cast?
Pro trans and pro women can (will
have to) coexist.
Unless you believe one is more important than the other, to the point of the lesser being immaterial.
have to) coexist.
Unless you believe one is more important than the other, to the point of the lesser being immaterial.
April 21, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Pro trans and pro women can (will
have to) coexist.
Unless you believe one is more important than the other, to the point of the lesser being immaterial.
have to) coexist.
Unless you believe one is more important than the other, to the point of the lesser being immaterial.
Still not answering my question on your statements.
I don’t think googling your name and/or your statements will provide me with your answer.
Stop responding then - or just answer.
I don’t think googling your name and/or your statements will provide me with your answer.
Stop responding then - or just answer.
April 21, 2025 at 2:58 AM
Still not answering my question on your statements.
I don’t think googling your name and/or your statements will provide me with your answer.
Stop responding then - or just answer.
I don’t think googling your name and/or your statements will provide me with your answer.
Stop responding then - or just answer.
Don’t believe all you read.
April 21, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Don’t believe all you read.
‘pro-women lobbyists’ I think she’d say.
She’d be pleased with the ‘most successful on earth’ description.
She’d be pleased with the ‘most successful on earth’ description.
April 21, 2025 at 2:51 AM
‘pro-women lobbyists’ I think she’d say.
She’d be pleased with the ‘most successful on earth’ description.
She’d be pleased with the ‘most successful on earth’ description.
Is it? I wouldn’t know.
April 21, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Is it? I wouldn’t know.
There you go again, who says it isn’t broken?
April 21, 2025 at 2:44 AM
There you go again, who says it isn’t broken?
You claimed you’re being eradicated, or being forced into danger.
You provide no answer to your claim.
If asserted without evidence, it can be dismissed without evidence.
You provide no answer to your claim.
If asserted without evidence, it can be dismissed without evidence.
April 21, 2025 at 2:42 AM
You claimed you’re being eradicated, or being forced into danger.
You provide no answer to your claim.
If asserted without evidence, it can be dismissed without evidence.
You provide no answer to your claim.
If asserted without evidence, it can be dismissed without evidence.
If you say so. I wouldn’t dare to disagree with your ruling - I might get called nasty names and told to go away.
April 21, 2025 at 2:35 AM
If you say so. I wouldn’t dare to disagree with your ruling - I might get called nasty names and told to go away.
On this device, facial recognition.
April 21, 2025 at 2:30 AM
On this device, facial recognition.
Still no answer.
April 21, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Still no answer.