This is great for consumers, but I think this also shows that we’ve allowed governments to become too comfortable demanding things from tech companies. Again this is a good request, however, it’s a slippery slope to the bad.

I don’t think that’s the case here, I think it’s the designer brand behind it that’s causing it to sell out.

As is the EU

This is genuinely what I love about Apple. The creativity is 🔥

That is very true. I just worry that the EU & UK are just stripping us of our privacy and quality features for their own gain and hiding it as anticompetitive or monopolistic takedowns. The industry has survived Apples features without issue for many years. To me it’s all just government control

I get that, but ATT is to block advertisers from tracking users. Apple ads biggest selling point is privacy. The ad developers can’t track or build profiles on you. I personally think the EU is overstepping its main role and ignoring its consumers. Who would choose to have tracked ads over private.

I’m not saying they shouldn’t follow their own ATT rules, they should. But at least with Apple it’s not farming data to sell on. I trust Apple with my data, other advertisers… definitely not.

Very possible 😂😂

I’m looking forward to seeing what the “vibrant” rebrand brings

It has been satisfying as hell to watch him fail in every debate 😂. I’m hoping he goes next week, his face is a jump scare in each episode.

Jony Ive could honestly make me buy anything. I don’t need a sailing lantern, but it’s just too beautiful to not own. 😅

How can they compare it to Gemini, when the primary feature you could compare isn’t included in Apple Intelligence yet. I also wouldn’t agree that they used it to sell iPhones, they don’t need AI to do that, also surveys showed that users wouldn’t be upgrading for AI, even before Apple delayed it

This is where Meta has killed themselves with privacy. I’d snap these up, but instead I’ll wait for Apple, where I know privacy is a big part of their product model. I don’t like the idea of Meta having access to cameras on my head.

Not agreement, but it shows a lack of confidence behind your original statements vs what is being debated against you. If you had stopped and I continued, then it would be odd. I’m simply replying to you, as you are, with me.

The irony, you’ve replied too. Why would I not reply? That would insinuate you were correct 🤷‍♂️

I love that you’re literally stripping clickbait down to its basic form of getting someone to click a link, despite clickbait in journalism essentially exclusively being misleading, exaggerated, or sensationalised. I could use your definition against anything that means I need to click to a new page

It’s hardly tricking people, you’re only going to click if you are buying or considering buying AirPods Pro 3. At the end of the day, they’re a news company, and they’re providing articles for people to read. It’s the aim of the game, don’t like it? Unfollow them lol it’s not that deep