Ryan
@ryan88.bsky.social
The problem with Mamdani is that I’m really unclear what even his one big win would be?
De Blasio deserves a lot of credit for UPK. He proposed it and got it done.
What will Mamdani aim to achieve as his number 1 issue?
I’m skeptical he has one achievable goal.
De Blasio deserves a lot of credit for UPK. He proposed it and got it done.
What will Mamdani aim to achieve as his number 1 issue?
I’m skeptical he has one achievable goal.
June 24, 2025 at 12:53 PM
The problem with Mamdani is that I’m really unclear what even his one big win would be?
De Blasio deserves a lot of credit for UPK. He proposed it and got it done.
What will Mamdani aim to achieve as his number 1 issue?
I’m skeptical he has one achievable goal.
De Blasio deserves a lot of credit for UPK. He proposed it and got it done.
What will Mamdani aim to achieve as his number 1 issue?
I’m skeptical he has one achievable goal.
You mean the fiasco that helped pave for Trump 2.0?
Exactly why did immigrants suddenly need everything for free after not needing that for the last 400 years?
Oh, that’s right, “the Groups.” Like the ones that showed up at Port Authority and told the migrants to go to shelters…
Exactly why did immigrants suddenly need everything for free after not needing that for the last 400 years?
Oh, that’s right, “the Groups.” Like the ones that showed up at Port Authority and told the migrants to go to shelters…
June 5, 2025 at 2:59 AM
You mean the fiasco that helped pave for Trump 2.0?
Exactly why did immigrants suddenly need everything for free after not needing that for the last 400 years?
Oh, that’s right, “the Groups.” Like the ones that showed up at Port Authority and told the migrants to go to shelters…
Exactly why did immigrants suddenly need everything for free after not needing that for the last 400 years?
Oh, that’s right, “the Groups.” Like the ones that showed up at Port Authority and told the migrants to go to shelters…
The subways are a public space. No one can reasonably expect total privacy. Find me a case where a court found otherwise.
If the NYPD uses AI to analyze the massive amounts of video they are getting - then so what? Obviously this is a more effective than walking around subway cars at random.
If the NYPD uses AI to analyze the massive amounts of video they are getting - then so what? Obviously this is a more effective than walking around subway cars at random.
April 30, 2025 at 3:51 AM
The subways are a public space. No one can reasonably expect total privacy. Find me a case where a court found otherwise.
If the NYPD uses AI to analyze the massive amounts of video they are getting - then so what? Obviously this is a more effective than walking around subway cars at random.
If the NYPD uses AI to analyze the massive amounts of video they are getting - then so what? Obviously this is a more effective than walking around subway cars at random.
lol bluesky is so warped.
We just had a homicidal necrophiliac discovered solely because of cameras.
Of course this is worth trying.
Yet, every reply is throwing a fit about it like there’s no safety issue at all.
We just had a homicidal necrophiliac discovered solely because of cameras.
Of course this is worth trying.
Yet, every reply is throwing a fit about it like there’s no safety issue at all.
April 29, 2025 at 4:23 PM
lol bluesky is so warped.
We just had a homicidal necrophiliac discovered solely because of cameras.
Of course this is worth trying.
Yet, every reply is throwing a fit about it like there’s no safety issue at all.
We just had a homicidal necrophiliac discovered solely because of cameras.
Of course this is worth trying.
Yet, every reply is throwing a fit about it like there’s no safety issue at all.
Reposted by Ryan
Whew, this conclusion from the Fourth Circuit:
"We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos."
"We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos."
April 17, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Whew, this conclusion from the Fourth Circuit:
"We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos."
"We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos."