Ryan Dawkins
banner
ryan-dawkins.bsky.social
Ryan Dawkins
@ryan-dawkins.bsky.social
Assistant Professor at Carleton College. Pol psych, Congress, parties/elections, REP, and urban politics. Native Coloradoan turned Minnesotan. Bad TV takes emphatically my own. He/him.

www.ryancdawkins.com
😂
July 18, 2025 at 3:47 PM
My 90 min flight from MSP to Chicago turned into me being stuck in the DC airport until tomorrow. Definitely not making the conference
April 3, 2025 at 11:08 AM
He is pretty awesome. I feel lucky to call him mine.
April 1, 2025 at 12:37 AM
Recent research from Enders and Thornton, which shows that educational polarization is a phenomenon among exclusively White Americans, supports this claim.
March 21, 2025 at 3:22 PM
I listened to the podcast this morning. A big part of the discussion about young voters also hinged on the gender gap. Shor’s data showed that among young voters it was real and enormous. The gap for voters under thirty was 23 points, over thirty half that.
March 18, 2025 at 6:16 PM
The wonders of partisan evaluations!
March 11, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Absolutely, we developed a theory of asymmetrical party politics rooted in the symbolic-operational disconnect in public opinion, which forces the Democrats to build their coalitional politics around a programmatic policy agenda, while Republicans build their using appeals to ideological identity.
February 25, 2025 at 8:34 PM
Our piece in PoP explains this pbenomenon, which we expand upon in the book Adam and I are writing. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Incongruent Voting or Symbolic Representation? Asymmetrical Representation in Congress, 2008–2014 | Perspectives on Politics | Cambridge Core
Incongruent Voting or Symbolic Representation? Asymmetrical Representation in Congress, 2008–2014 - Volume 20 Issue 3
www.cambridge.org
February 25, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Is this data publicly available? I have a couple of students interested in black political behavior.
February 13, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Ah, yes. That would be the work around. Thanks!
January 29, 2025 at 1:17 AM
How is this not an obvious violation of the first Amendment’s freedom of association? The federal government cannot dictate who you associate with peacefully.
January 29, 2025 at 1:06 AM
I’ve thought about this paper multiple times over the last six months.
January 23, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Yep! Send me your email via DM
January 18, 2025 at 3:29 PM
Yep! Exactly right. We cite them in our paper.
January 18, 2025 at 3:19 PM
I’d love your thoughts on it. We are turning this paper into a book. We’ve written four of six empirical chapters and hope to get under contract this year
January 18, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Which would make sense because the party out of the White House always seems like it is operating in a power vacuum. Congressional leadership can sometimes fill that void if strong enough, as was the case under Pelosi or Gingrich, but they often can’t.
January 18, 2025 at 3:14 PM