...this would also trigger UN involvement.

Details to be negotiated, of course, but the rules need to be uniform and have some teeth to them. No viable system of social justice?

Then NO sovereignty.

The idea here, obviously, is that if your country's "wise men" are unable to obtain cooperation from their defendants and plaintiffs at the federal level, the UN will move in to restore order.

And, in cases of corruption — like not following their own best practices or "stari decisus"...

It occurred to me today that since the US Courts have no viable means of enforcing their orders that the US, and every other sovereign, use the UN and their peacekeeping forces, by agreement, as the enforcement arm of each country's judiciary.

Ravenmadmaven

Elite private schools are owned by the Chinese. So banning TikTok is imperative, of course. It has nothing to do with the peasantry.

File under unintended consequences:
Abrogation of the US Constitution through one or more illegal acts places every US State up for grabs by ANY sovereign it so chooses.

TRUCK FUMP.