ruthewil.bsky.social
@ruthewil.bsky.social
Ezra, Kirk’s debates were setups, not open discussions. He used them to promote his propaganda. He wasn’t honest. He wasn’t sincere. You envied his success. But he had no values that advocated for the common good. It was about growing his influence, period. Maybe that’s all you care about too?
September 13, 2025 at 9:44 AM
Just like honoring confederate generals.
September 1, 2025 at 9:37 AM
And any liberals or progressives or socialists. They think they’re being pure by voting their conscience. Unalive Palestinians don’t give a ff about conscience. Staying alive is about what’s practical.
September 1, 2025 at 8:59 AM
Why would you think that? We elected Trump!
September 1, 2025 at 8:51 AM
In the system now, Schumer/Jeffries will be replaced by people behind them. Dems have to use a new model of guerrilla party politics. Forget the DNC. We need a scrum of liberal politicians who accede to the winner. Strength lies in the struggle and in the hive mind. No Savior! Gavin is joking!
September 1, 2025 at 8:00 AM
“Support“ was the word used. Different. Pay attention.
September 1, 2025 at 7:43 AM
Me too and yes! Under 40! Please!
September 1, 2025 at 7:40 AM
Yes. I figured out the D fundraising texts are from consultants who work on commission. So telling me 1000 times to send money is to their financial benefit only. I ignore all political fundraising texts calls and emails. Lack of money is not the Dems problem.
September 1, 2025 at 7:39 AM
But let’s prosecute someone throwing a sandwich at a police officer—that’s really dangerous don’t ya know!
August 18, 2025 at 12:51 AM
Go on X and be different. Don’t pay. Be civil. Post facts. Don’t use innuendos in your comments. Don’t engage with trolls on their terms. Calmly state what a trade deficit is and that equalizing them is not a thing. Make X a different place. An echo chamber is not needed now, and it’s boring. 2/2
April 3, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Great way to explain it. The concept of “trade deficit” is not a matter of making them equal between countries in order to be fair. “Ahh, we’re so prosperous—Unfair!” This will give Trump lots to negotiate. Maybe keep him distracted?
April 3, 2025 at 3:36 AM
That tracks. Imagine Trump if he wasn’t born into wealth.
April 3, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Yes! BS scardicats.
April 2, 2025 at 1:23 AM
Exactly. That’s all Trump has. Control of the media space. And he’s screwing up the entire world by his sheer egotistical confidence. If every D senator did this once in the next year—would it get attention—yes!
April 2, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Yes!
April 2, 2025 at 1:17 AM
Well, Republicans obviously gain publicity for their POV.
April 2, 2025 at 1:14 AM
I see you’re joking but right now I feel messages are so mixed that cynical jokes are counterproductive.
April 2, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Elaborate your point please.
April 1, 2025 at 11:15 PM
How do you feel about civil rights for all people? If all are treated fairly and equally then flags aren’t needed. Until that era returns, flags send an important message.
April 1, 2025 at 11:12 PM
I’ve suspected that too. This is the level of thinking and analysis we now cater to.
April 1, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Not sure that’s true. Every human norm has exceptions, the world humans inhabit is not an algorithm.
April 1, 2025 at 11:09 PM
I disagree. System has bs elements like all human endeavors. But a sincere vote definitely matters.
April 1, 2025 at 11:01 PM