Going by divide as "separate", as in separately defined processes & tools dictates individuals and interactions instead of individuals deciding this themselves, I am taking a guess at current state-of-the-art peak enterprise software-based product development. The stuff you hear about from Gartner.

Siste act jeg oppdaget var Emma-Jean Thackray. Funky og rart! Og fett! Kom over det da jeg handlet nyeste Galliano-albumet og browset litt på labelen brownswood.ochre.store, og det ble dermed med i shopping-carten.

Emma-Jean Thackray - Weirdo: emmajeanthackray.lnk.to/weirdo

Er det en slags variant av supertrikset med “forsinket” tam-fill? Altså at fillet som tradisjonelt brukes som overgang/oppbygging til neste periode, spilles faktisk ikke før enern i perioden det skal lede til, også lander man typisk på crash (og skarp) på toern, og grooven fortsetter således derfra?

This really strikes a chord with me, because it is just yet another variant of the same pattern all over again. And it fascinates me how some gets really emotional when I propose that product teams may benefit with also having ops/platform experts as actual team members.

Sounds familiar? Not that many years ago, developers needed to be "shielded" from the business and their users and customers, because that world is so chaotic, and development is complicated, expensive, and time-consuming enough. We must optimize for developers to focus on their craft in isolation.

What I am curious about, and also open to being an issue, is that the tooling offered by the big cloud platform providers, is so bad, and so low level, that you need this extra layer of protection and "abstraction" from them before your runtime environment is exposed to devs on your product teams.

Years and years ago we had teams to make Web frameworks on top of Web frameworks. Eventually we figured out that it is harmful to base applications on badly designed in-house tech scaffolds.

Now we make platforms on top of platforms instead.

It is equally possible to use arguably “better” tooling that may be more aligned with modern and effective software/product dev practices, and still be task-oriented. The difference is in to what degree a tool “drives” status quo of obsolete practice. No tool is neutral in affecting human behavior.

Awesome talk, thank you! I admittedly haven’t read the book, but on numerous occasions I have thought “Wait, what?” when being presented with arguments citing this book.

I need to study this.

Har lagt til meg vanen å bare ta med flaskepant fortløpende på så og si alle turer på butikken. Senest i dag pantet jeg 2 flasker. Det er ca 0 mer effort enn å ikke ta de med, og da slipper jeg følelsen og tidsbruken av "pant som aktivitet" fordi det bygger seg aldri opp store lass med flaskepant.

Been following Alveus Sanctuary for a while on YouTube. Really relaxing faith-in-humanity-restored type of content.

I was actually looking forward to exploring what various artists and bands I take interest in are posting on IG, but seems I have to not be too eager, or I might upset the shitty algorithms that supposedly detect shady activity. What a joke.

Legitimate users got a crippled version of the program, and those chosing to pirate it (I do not condone that at all) got a way better version than the people who paid for it. It was also some who paid for the software, as you should, and used the crack to unlock the full performance.