Rubén Marciel
banner
rumarciel.bsky.social
Rubén Marciel
@rumarciel.bsky.social
Postdoc, University of Geneva. Philosophy, democracy, and journalism. Exploring how to build trustworthy news media.

Publications: https://philpeople.org/profiles/ruben-marciel
I fully support your suggested title. Additional advantage: it will get you so many visits
January 24, 2025 at 2:04 PM
12/ (c) GOOD REASONS OFFERED BY UNINFLUENTIAL AGENTS, as those good contributions to deliberation would be probably lost without journalists’ help.

Full article here: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Pre-print here: philpeople.org/profiles/rub...
January 6, 2025 at 5:47 PM
11/
(a) Reasons underlying prior POLITICAL DECISIONS, as reporting on them promotes the making and the acceptance of legitimate decisions.

(b) BAD REASONS DISSEMINATED BY POWERFUL AGENTS, as influential agents could diminish the quality of deliberation if uncontested.
January 6, 2025 at 5:47 PM
10/ Regarding arguments, journalists should report not only the EXPLICIT REASONS invoked in public debates, but also IMPLICIT REASONS that may remain hidden, as well as CRITICAL REFLECTIONS that could foster quality audience engagement.

Three kinds of reasons are specially likely to be newsworthy:
January 6, 2025 at 5:47 PM