Ivan Brunetti should resurrect his old Nancy series for her

This is a state of the art pedestrian island in a complete street by a park with speed camera in Chicago last Sunday.

So, I helped @divvybikes.bsky.social by reporting a maintenance and safety issue. Is this a “negative ride”? If so, why? Also, my reward is a ride in ridehailing car that might kill another cyclist?

So, here’s a pedestrian island, in a crossing to a park with kids sports. Extremely well lit, a “road diet,” and prominent pedestrian signs on the island…both flattened. If a pedestrian was standing there in the most advanced design, they’d be dead. The problem is drivers

“Great news!” Lyft can continue to exploit their workers and enrich billionaires!

Meanwhile, UPS in my neighborhood couldn’t be bothered to park around the corner in a designated, better space.

I'm only on this b/c of my Divvy membership,which predates @lyft, and is now more than 2x. Should the hold the @divvy contract when it’s actively lobbying against pay for their workers? And talking about "affordable transportation" when e-bikes more than TCP?

It seems that these goons couldn’t even keep their badge. They are paramilitaries.

Maybe I should take up urban biathlon.

We know of “sneckdowns” and “desire lines” afforded by snow, but let’s add “danger lines” showing where “just a minute” (though this was at least an hour) drivers in the bike lanes.

"Innovation of the Month" is illuminating intersections with streetlights...instead of shaming pedestrians into wearing reflective vests, carrying flashlights, and making load noises, then blaming them for any crash?