RubberCF
@rubbercf.bsky.social
University student, studying psychology and philosophy, dirty apostate
my mom often cites a lack of "thankfulness" when justifying things like cutting USAID or grant funding for universities
the starving infants and scientists who develop lifesaving medical treatments arent thankful enough
the starving infants and scientists who develop lifesaving medical treatments arent thankful enough
November 9, 2025 at 8:51 AM
my mom often cites a lack of "thankfulness" when justifying things like cutting USAID or grant funding for universities
the starving infants and scientists who develop lifesaving medical treatments arent thankful enough
the starving infants and scientists who develop lifesaving medical treatments arent thankful enough
It would be monumentally disappointing if this was why Talarico loses. I'll admit though it would be funny to see republican attack ads like "are you sure you want a senator who looks at porn???"
November 9, 2025 at 8:31 AM
It would be monumentally disappointing if this was why Talarico loses. I'll admit though it would be funny to see republican attack ads like "are you sure you want a senator who looks at porn???"
Its so interesting how the left seems to suffer more from infighting when its the far right that has views 90% of people would consider fundamentally morally bankrupt. Youd think moderate right wingers would have more issues with the far right than moderate left wingers have with the far left
November 4, 2025 at 7:52 AM
Its so interesting how the left seems to suffer more from infighting when its the far right that has views 90% of people would consider fundamentally morally bankrupt. Youd think moderate right wingers would have more issues with the far right than moderate left wingers have with the far left
Yeah not only does it strafe quickly, theres no reason to not jump around to your hearts content.
September 8, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Yeah not only does it strafe quickly, theres no reason to not jump around to your hearts content.
Actually we can do something about community backlash because we are each part of the community. Repeatedly criticizing the resonse for creating mistrust only emphasizes reasons to mistrust SSC, when we could be explaining why they can and should still be trusted.
September 6, 2025 at 1:34 AM
Actually we can do something about community backlash because we are each part of the community. Repeatedly criticizing the resonse for creating mistrust only emphasizes reasons to mistrust SSC, when we could be explaining why they can and should still be trusted.
There will always be valid criticism to be made about details, but as a whole i think the response was justified given the circumstances, and an effective demonstration that we can trust SSC to do their due diligence in cases and respond to good faith critiques.
August 29, 2025 at 2:51 AM
There will always be valid criticism to be made about details, but as a whole i think the response was justified given the circumstances, and an effective demonstration that we can trust SSC to do their due diligence in cases and respond to good faith critiques.
I think theres definitely room to disagree with or defend what *exactly* SSC did decide to share, but either way its clear that they were very thoughtful and intentional about it. My issue is with people treating the whole response as unjustified just because some of the details were private
August 29, 2025 at 2:42 AM
I think theres definitely room to disagree with or defend what *exactly* SSC did decide to share, but either way its clear that they were very thoughtful and intentional about it. My issue is with people treating the whole response as unjustified just because some of the details were private
Especially when that disinformation has prevented them from doing their job effectively, keeping the community safe.
Anyways those are just my thoughts. Not a criticism of the video
Anyways those are just my thoughts. Not a criticism of the video
August 29, 2025 at 1:33 AM
Especially when that disinformation has prevented them from doing their job effectively, keeping the community safe.
Anyways those are just my thoughts. Not a criticism of the video
Anyways those are just my thoughts. Not a criticism of the video
Few were concerned about privacy when Six shared intimate messages, or how they might affect legal proceedings, so clearly its *sometimes* excusable despite those concerns. Yet SSC is expected to take the video down over privacy and legal concerns even to combat disinformation?
August 29, 2025 at 1:33 AM
Few were concerned about privacy when Six shared intimate messages, or how they might affect legal proceedings, so clearly its *sometimes* excusable despite those concerns. Yet SSC is expected to take the video down over privacy and legal concerns even to combat disinformation?
Under normal circumstances, it would be wrong for SSC to reveal what they did. But when one party takes advantage of confidentiality to freely spread their own narrative about the case, theres a point where confidentiality/privacy is secondary to truth
August 29, 2025 at 1:32 AM
Under normal circumstances, it would be wrong for SSC to reveal what they did. But when one party takes advantage of confidentiality to freely spread their own narrative about the case, theres a point where confidentiality/privacy is secondary to truth
All well said. I'll admit, I think the whole "this never should have been made public" sentiment is kind of over-applied. Yes, it should not have been made public. But it WAS made public, and because it was, each relevant party has a right to set the record straight when another misrepresents it
August 29, 2025 at 1:30 AM
All well said. I'll admit, I think the whole "this never should have been made public" sentiment is kind of over-applied. Yes, it should not have been made public. But it WAS made public, and because it was, each relevant party has a right to set the record straight when another misrepresents it
SSC cant keep the community safe if misinformation about then abounds freely. Theres a point where they have a right to respond
August 27, 2025 at 7:53 PM
SSC cant keep the community safe if misinformation about then abounds freely. Theres a point where they have a right to respond
They have to be able to respond when misinformation about a case is spread to hurt their image, which makes their work to keep the community safe much harder
August 27, 2025 at 7:14 PM
They have to be able to respond when misinformation about a case is spread to hurt their image, which makes their work to keep the community safe much harder
Its explained in the video, thats how they know
August 24, 2025 at 5:47 AM
Its explained in the video, thats how they know
Im not sure what eitherbof those have to do with what i said, also how did they doxx Six and iMad?
August 24, 2025 at 4:50 AM
Im not sure what eitherbof those have to do with what i said, also how did they doxx Six and iMad?
Because it concerns community safety? Also a ruling for madness was already made months ago, even if it was quite short.
August 23, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Because it concerns community safety? Also a ruling for madness was already made months ago, even if it was quite short.
Tbf as the video explains, the legal case has already been finished, the current lawsuit isnt about whether or not Gem is guilty
August 23, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Tbf as the video explains, the legal case has already been finished, the current lawsuit isnt about whether or not Gem is guilty