Cloister Coven
@rrlcoven.bsky.social
The official Cloister Coven game developer account.
🔞
🔞
Alright, but bald because shaved, naired, or curse of the mummy?
January 7, 2026 at 4:21 AM
Alright, but bald because shaved, naired, or curse of the mummy?
Reposted by Cloister Coven
as I read it, it would effectively ban Google from showing "sexual material harmful to minors" in search.
Listings for porn sites, OF creators on X, Amazon results for books like Beloved and Fun Home, trans health services, drag clips, Wikipedia pages on BDSM ... all magically disappeared.
Listings for porn sites, OF creators on X, Amazon results for books like Beloved and Fun Home, trans health services, drag clips, Wikipedia pages on BDSM ... all magically disappeared.
Oklahoma bill barring drag performances harmful to minors advances out of committee • Oklahoma Voice
State senators on Tuesday greenlighted a controversial bill that could make Oklahoma the latest state to attempt to ban children from watching drag and cabaret performances deemed harmful to minors.
oklahomavoice.com
December 31, 2025 at 8:00 PM
as I read it, it would effectively ban Google from showing "sexual material harmful to minors" in search.
Listings for porn sites, OF creators on X, Amazon results for books like Beloved and Fun Home, trans health services, drag clips, Wikipedia pages on BDSM ... all magically disappeared.
Listings for porn sites, OF creators on X, Amazon results for books like Beloved and Fun Home, trans health services, drag clips, Wikipedia pages on BDSM ... all magically disappeared.
Incredible and true trivia.
December 28, 2025 at 5:23 AM
Incredible and true trivia.
Tim fanart, before being unjustly imprisoned in a 3x3 puddle by a kitsune.
December 28, 2025 at 4:46 AM
Tim fanart, before being unjustly imprisoned in a 3x3 puddle by a kitsune.
Reposted by Cloister Coven
Since X has created a machine for removing Glaze and in violation of the Glaze application creating derivative works via AI … I hope this comes up at the Class Action suit against X.
Anyone who chooses to remove Glaze from art in order to feed it to AI is saying …
“I am willfully, knowingly , and malicious subverting the intention of the copyright holder in favor of for my personal interests”
“I am willfully, knowingly , and malicious subverting the intention of the copyright holder in favor of for my personal interests”
For those who don’t know. Glaze in the context of AI is a technique of making art art confusing to AI while making it virtually unchanged to the human eye.
An Artist using Glaze on their work is effectively saying:
“I in no way consent to my copyrighted works being used by AI in any way”
An Artist using Glaze on their work is effectively saying:
“I in no way consent to my copyrighted works being used by AI in any way”
December 24, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Since X has created a machine for removing Glaze and in violation of the Glaze application creating derivative works via AI … I hope this comes up at the Class Action suit against X.
Reposted by Cloister Coven
Anyone who chooses to remove Glaze from art in order to feed it to AI is saying …
“I am willfully, knowingly , and malicious subverting the intention of the copyright holder in favor of for my personal interests”
“I am willfully, knowingly , and malicious subverting the intention of the copyright holder in favor of for my personal interests”
For those who don’t know. Glaze in the context of AI is a technique of making art art confusing to AI while making it virtually unchanged to the human eye.
An Artist using Glaze on their work is effectively saying:
“I in no way consent to my copyrighted works being used by AI in any way”
An Artist using Glaze on their work is effectively saying:
“I in no way consent to my copyrighted works being used by AI in any way”
For further context twitter added a button that allows users to generate ai images using existing art posts from artists. It removes glaze and it basically reskins the artwork by using the existing work as a base. Twitter is no longer a safe space for art
December 24, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Anyone who chooses to remove Glaze from art in order to feed it to AI is saying …
“I am willfully, knowingly , and malicious subverting the intention of the copyright holder in favor of for my personal interests”
“I am willfully, knowingly , and malicious subverting the intention of the copyright holder in favor of for my personal interests”
Reposted by Cloister Coven
For further context twitter added a button that allows users to generate ai images using existing art posts from artists. It removes glaze and it basically reskins the artwork by using the existing work as a base. Twitter is no longer a safe space for art
December 24, 2025 at 8:03 PM
For further context twitter added a button that allows users to generate ai images using existing art posts from artists. It removes glaze and it basically reskins the artwork by using the existing work as a base. Twitter is no longer a safe space for art
"Do I throw out whole games for being caught & unknowingly praise those that just weren’t?"
Yes. It's the same as with other plagiarism. You won't know it happened until it's made public, and you're not about to reward a plagiarist to any extent.
Yes. It's the same as with other plagiarism. You won't know it happened until it's made public, and you're not about to reward a plagiarist to any extent.
December 21, 2025 at 2:36 AM
"Do I throw out whole games for being caught & unknowingly praise those that just weren’t?"
Yes. It's the same as with other plagiarism. You won't know it happened until it's made public, and you're not about to reward a plagiarist to any extent.
Yes. It's the same as with other plagiarism. You won't know it happened until it's made public, and you're not about to reward a plagiarist to any extent.
This would only serve to encourage further heavy-handed, corporate censorship, because it would make them liable for the content on their platforms.
If you want to deal with misinformation, pass laws against content pushing to users by websites, algorithmic and directed, as that is the root of it.
If you want to deal with misinformation, pass laws against content pushing to users by websites, algorithmic and directed, as that is the root of it.
December 13, 2025 at 1:37 AM
This would only serve to encourage further heavy-handed, corporate censorship, because it would make them liable for the content on their platforms.
If you want to deal with misinformation, pass laws against content pushing to users by websites, algorithmic and directed, as that is the root of it.
If you want to deal with misinformation, pass laws against content pushing to users by websites, algorithmic and directed, as that is the root of it.