Rotate the Court
@rotatethecourt.bsky.social
A structural reform to reduce volatility and restore legitimacy at the Supreme Court.
Bruen wasn’t just a gun case, it was a power move.
When the same small group both writes the test and monopolizes its application, lower courts are left guessing and legitimacy erodes.
This is why dispersing decisional authority matters more than debating any single outcome.
When the same small group both writes the test and monopolizes its application, lower courts are left guessing and legitimacy erodes.
This is why dispersing decisional authority matters more than debating any single outcome.
January 21, 2026 at 5:10 PM
Bruen wasn’t just a gun case, it was a power move.
When the same small group both writes the test and monopolizes its application, lower courts are left guessing and legitimacy erodes.
This is why dispersing decisional authority matters more than debating any single outcome.
When the same small group both writes the test and monopolizes its application, lower courts are left guessing and legitimacy erodes.
This is why dispersing decisional authority matters more than debating any single outcome.
New studies find Supreme Court outcomes increasingly predictable by ideology and money.
Agree or not, predictability itself is the problem.
When the same small group decides every case for decades, legitimacy erodes.
Fix the structure, not the outcomes.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/u...
Agree or not, predictability itself is the problem.
When the same small group decides every case for decades, legitimacy erodes.
Fix the structure, not the outcomes.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/u...
Supreme Court Increasingly Favors the Rich, Economists Say
www.nytimes.com
January 6, 2026 at 11:22 PM
New studies find Supreme Court outcomes increasingly predictable by ideology and money.
Agree or not, predictability itself is the problem.
When the same small group decides every case for decades, legitimacy erodes.
Fix the structure, not the outcomes.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/u...
Agree or not, predictability itself is the problem.
When the same small group decides every case for decades, legitimacy erodes.
Fix the structure, not the outcomes.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/u...
If even the most successful justice on today’s Supreme Court feels embattled, that tells us something important.
A system that turns victory into permanent personal warfare is structurally broken, regardless of ideology.
www.cnn.com/2025/12/29/p...
A system that turns victory into permanent personal warfare is structurally broken, regardless of ideology.
www.cnn.com/2025/12/29/p...
ANALYSIS: Samuel Alito keeps getting his way. So why does he seem so unhappy? | CNN Politics
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has a remarkable record of transforming his old dissenting opinions into the new majority view and setting the direction of the law in America.
www.cnn.com
December 30, 2025 at 10:37 PM
If even the most successful justice on today’s Supreme Court feels embattled, that tells us something important.
A system that turns victory into permanent personal warfare is structurally broken, regardless of ideology.
www.cnn.com/2025/12/29/p...
A system that turns victory into permanent personal warfare is structurally broken, regardless of ideology.
www.cnn.com/2025/12/29/p...
Honest question: Why is the Supreme Court the only appellate court in the federal system that doesn’t use rotating panels?
December 21, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Honest question: Why is the Supreme Court the only appellate court in the federal system that doesn’t use rotating panels?
Rotating panels aren’t radical.
They’re how courts already limit concentrated power.
We use them in all our appellate courts, except at the very top.
That’s the flaw.
rotatethecourt.org
They’re how courts already limit concentrated power.
We use them in all our appellate courts, except at the very top.
That’s the flaw.
rotatethecourt.org
Rotate the Court
A simple, constitutional fix to reduce volatility and restore legitimacy to the Supreme Court.
rotatethecourt.org
December 20, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Rotating panels aren’t radical.
They’re how courts already limit concentrated power.
We use them in all our appellate courts, except at the very top.
That’s the flaw.
rotatethecourt.org
They’re how courts already limit concentrated power.
We use them in all our appellate courts, except at the very top.
That’s the flaw.
rotatethecourt.org
The Supreme Court is structurally broken.
One retirement. One confirmation. Decades of consequences.
There’s a simple, constitutional fix: rotating panels that reduce concentrated power and restore stability.
rotatethecourt.org
One retirement. One confirmation. Decades of consequences.
There’s a simple, constitutional fix: rotating panels that reduce concentrated power and restore stability.
rotatethecourt.org
Rotate the Court
A simple structural reform to stabilize the Supreme Court
rotatethecourt.org
December 19, 2025 at 4:51 AM
The Supreme Court is structurally broken.
One retirement. One confirmation. Decades of consequences.
There’s a simple, constitutional fix: rotating panels that reduce concentrated power and restore stability.
rotatethecourt.org
One retirement. One confirmation. Decades of consequences.
There’s a simple, constitutional fix: rotating panels that reduce concentrated power and restore stability.
rotatethecourt.org