I don't think it's being recorded, unfortunately. But eventually I'll write up a paper about it :)

Thanks to @philsci.bsky.social for supporting online conferencing and its sustainability and accessibility benefits.

Instead of thinking about motivation, I'll look at things like epistemic agency, aesthetics, values, individualism, meritocracy and injustices.
tl;dr Gamification can be great, but we should be careful about what are set up as values and what expectations people get about their agency

The conference is supported by the solidarity society uit.no/om/foreninge...

Tomorrow I'll be talking about disciplinary marginalisation. Feminist philosophy of science has moved from the margins to the mainstream. Feminist philosophy isn't niche, and now we know it! But we have to keep up solidarity amongst feminist philosophers of all stripes.

Scientists reflect on what it’s like to work with philosophers
Joeri Witteveen chats about taxonomy, conservation and biodiversity
Li-an Yu, Karen Yan and Ruey-Lin Chen on the APPSA and philosophy of science in Taiwan
Adrian Currie takes the Proust Questionnaire
Tips for summer listening

Not yet! But I'm working on it :)

Sometimes it feels like people think Douglas invented the science and values debate ex nihilo in 2009

We shouldn't be complacent about the status of feminist work in mainstream philosophy of science, especially not today. And it's not just censorship and bans. Cuts to academia all over the place threaten marginalised work and marginalised scholars.

I'm kicking it off with some words from @shaslang.bsky.social. Fifteen years ago but still feels very relevant today, especially given rising precarity in academia.

But fortunately birdwatchers love challenges and go all in for observing "dull" birds www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

One pretty obvious bias: we tend to notice male birds more, because they're flashier and easier to identify. So we end up with sexist science where males are overrepresented.
www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/arti...