Ron Jenkins
@ronajenkins.bsky.social
I like taking macro and closeup photos. Images are mine unless otherwise noted. Canon R8, Canon T7i, Sigma 70mm f/2.8 Macro, Laowa 25mm f/2.8 2.5-5x, etc.
She has a black heart. She lies without effort. And she's abysmally ignorant.
So perfectly suited for the job of Press Secretary to the Trump Administration.
So perfectly suited for the job of Press Secretary to the Trump Administration.
December 4, 2025 at 2:14 PM
She has a black heart. She lies without effort. And she's abysmally ignorant.
So perfectly suited for the job of Press Secretary to the Trump Administration.
So perfectly suited for the job of Press Secretary to the Trump Administration.
Somebody should tell him if he does that he will have zero chance of a Nobel Peace Prize.
December 4, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Somebody should tell him if he does that he will have zero chance of a Nobel Peace Prize.
"It's a con job" says the con man.
90% of Americans know Trump's a con man, but 35% of Americans don't think Trump is conning them.
90% of Americans know Trump's a con man, but 35% of Americans don't think Trump is conning them.
December 4, 2025 at 2:03 PM
"It's a con job" says the con man.
90% of Americans know Trump's a con man, but 35% of Americans don't think Trump is conning them.
90% of Americans know Trump's a con man, but 35% of Americans don't think Trump is conning them.
Kind of like Trump latching onto the presidency as a way to escape. Escape going to jail.
Melania, Trump, Maxwell, and Epstein were none of them victims. You're working hard to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Melania, Trump, Maxwell, and Epstein were none of them victims. You're working hard to give her the benefit of the doubt.
November 29, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Kind of like Trump latching onto the presidency as a way to escape. Escape going to jail.
Melania, Trump, Maxwell, and Epstein were none of them victims. You're working hard to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Melania, Trump, Maxwell, and Epstein were none of them victims. You're working hard to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Something to bring to court, if needed.
November 25, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Something to bring to court, if needed.
Reduction is a lot of work. They just won't release the stuff.
November 19, 2025 at 12:53 PM
Reduction is a lot of work. They just won't release the stuff.
Sez who? You don't seem to understand the Presidential pardon as it's used today.
November 19, 2025 at 12:51 PM
Sez who? You don't seem to understand the Presidential pardon as it's used today.
Still using the word "should" as if it has meaning when it comes to American politics today . . .
November 19, 2025 at 12:49 PM
Still using the word "should" as if it has meaning when it comes to American politics today . . .
It's a dry run for next year when the Speaker of the House refuses to seat duly elected Democrats in the mid-term elections.
Should be a HUGE red flag.
Should be a HUGE red flag.
October 27, 2025 at 2:33 PM
It's a dry run for next year when the Speaker of the House refuses to seat duly elected Democrats in the mid-term elections.
Should be a HUGE red flag.
Should be a HUGE red flag.
There's only one question these days: Who is going to stop him? Physically.
Not: Are they "bound" by ethics rules and the Constitution? "Bound" suggests physical restraints.
Not: Are they "bound" by ethics rules and the Constitution? "Bound" suggests physical restraints.
October 26, 2025 at 6:34 PM
There's only one question these days: Who is going to stop him? Physically.
Not: Are they "bound" by ethics rules and the Constitution? "Bound" suggests physical restraints.
Not: Are they "bound" by ethics rules and the Constitution? "Bound" suggests physical restraints.
I can't argue with this but I still want to punch him.
October 25, 2025 at 6:52 PM
I can't argue with this but I still want to punch him.
It's also about showing that the Speaker of the House can refuse to seat legitimately elected representatives.
It's a dry run for 2026 mid-term elections.
It's a dry run for 2026 mid-term elections.
October 25, 2025 at 6:51 PM
It's also about showing that the Speaker of the House can refuse to seat legitimately elected representatives.
It's a dry run for 2026 mid-term elections.
It's a dry run for 2026 mid-term elections.
And she really only said he **acts** like he's weak and puny.
Which he does.
Which he does.
October 25, 2025 at 6:43 PM
And she really only said he **acts** like he's weak and puny.
Which he does.
Which he does.
Too much truth for sucky baby Trump.
October 25, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Too much truth for sucky baby Trump.
Vampires don't age
October 25, 2025 at 6:31 PM
Vampires don't age
Right place, Right time.
AKA corruption
AKA corruption
October 25, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Right place, Right time.
AKA corruption
AKA corruption
Gotta do that or corruption deepens.
October 25, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Gotta do that or corruption deepens.
He's a lumberjack and he's OK
He sleeps all night and he works all day
He cuts down trees, he eats his lunch
He goes to the lavatory
On Wednesdays he goes shopping and has buttered scones for tea
He sleeps all night and he works all day
He cuts down trees, he eats his lunch
He goes to the lavatory
On Wednesdays he goes shopping and has buttered scones for tea
October 18, 2025 at 1:07 PM
He's a lumberjack and he's OK
He sleeps all night and he works all day
He cuts down trees, he eats his lunch
He goes to the lavatory
On Wednesdays he goes shopping and has buttered scones for tea
He sleeps all night and he works all day
He cuts down trees, he eats his lunch
He goes to the lavatory
On Wednesdays he goes shopping and has buttered scones for tea
If he persists in thinking nationwide tariffs solve every economic problems state-by-state, he's dumber than I thought.
September 29, 2025 at 4:40 PM
If he persists in thinking nationwide tariffs solve every economic problems state-by-state, he's dumber than I thought.
Strong point. Especially depending on the book.
September 16, 2025 at 11:01 AM
Strong point. Especially depending on the book.
"taken in" is misleading phrasing, suggesting money coming *into* America.
But actually, it's money taken into the US Treasury, transferred from importers and consumers already *inside* America.
So no, actually $0 "taken in".
But actually, it's money taken into the US Treasury, transferred from importers and consumers already *inside* America.
So no, actually $0 "taken in".
September 2, 2025 at 7:34 PM
"taken in" is misleading phrasing, suggesting money coming *into* America.
But actually, it's money taken into the US Treasury, transferred from importers and consumers already *inside* America.
So no, actually $0 "taken in".
But actually, it's money taken into the US Treasury, transferred from importers and consumers already *inside* America.
So no, actually $0 "taken in".
There should be no pardon power. It's contrary to the balance of power in US governance, when one branch (executive) can override another (judicial).
Or, if for some reason POTUS "MUST" have pardon power, POTUS should only be able to pardon for convictions rendered before they became President.
Or, if for some reason POTUS "MUST" have pardon power, POTUS should only be able to pardon for convictions rendered before they became President.
August 10, 2025 at 9:16 PM
There should be no pardon power. It's contrary to the balance of power in US governance, when one branch (executive) can override another (judicial).
Or, if for some reason POTUS "MUST" have pardon power, POTUS should only be able to pardon for convictions rendered before they became President.
Or, if for some reason POTUS "MUST" have pardon power, POTUS should only be able to pardon for convictions rendered before they became President.
