Rolski 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🇩🇪
banner
rolski.bsky.social
Rolski 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🇩🇪
@rolski.bsky.social
No DMs. An avid lurker & liker - of similarly-minded people. Posts will be rare.
EU Residency since the B-word... From Exeter, homes are now Cologne & Cheltenham.
Professional Engineer. Gen X. Fundamentalist Atheist. Reader of Books. Listener to Tunes
I think that's the winner!
November 1, 2025 at 5:41 PM
SättigkeitsKaufFehler
November 1, 2025 at 5:31 PM
Times Radio 'Breakfast Show' can also be shockingly partisan, but I guess the Editorial Direction does come from the Murdochs...
Since Aasmah Mir left, there's no handbrake left to maintain sanity & rein in some of the 'views'...
October 20, 2025 at 7:21 AM
I feel that you just don't want to understand.

And it's not my job to explain - as I've already mentioned it's the job of the Self-Driving Co's - so I'll leave it to them & their 'hundreds of lobbyists'.

I'll be using Self-Driving Vehicles at every opportunity, but for now it's time to log-off...
October 19, 2025 at 5:02 PM
There's so much information available if people would just make the effort to look & try to understand, rather than take every opportunity to naysay.

The Armchair Experts will never be satisfied, of course.

I hope your concerns will be calmed elsewhere / eventually - time for my Sunday afternoon!
October 19, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Again (!) the whole point is to prevent the vehicle from getting into any of these situations: by definition the vehicle is designed & programmed not to ever have to deal with 'The Trolley Problem'.

However, preparing for every single possible eventuality in the Universe is of course not possible.
October 19, 2025 at 4:30 PM
My frustration (from a position of knowledge) is that these Companies don't do nearly enough Promo or Information Campaigns - they really need to do a significant amount more.

There's a huge amount of data that has been gathered & can be shared, with simple explanations to calm fears & speculation.
October 19, 2025 at 4:23 PM
My last involvement with a Self-Driving project was ~5 years ago.
Since then, e.g. Waymo / Aurora / Nuro / etc have had tens of millions of miles more experience.

And they're heavily monitored by NHTSA & IIHS etc.

There have been accidents, but the majority IIRC were below 1mph closing speed.
October 19, 2025 at 4:17 PM
And then the realisation that the 'robot' vehicle is seeing far far more than any human ever can & that it's dealing with the information far quicker than we can.
It never gets tired, it's never distracted, it never thinks it's late, it never worries about a headache, or an argument.
It just drives.
October 19, 2025 at 4:14 PM
The other fascinating aspect - if the vehicle has a 'display screen' so that you can see what it's seeing - is the realisation what an incredible job the human brain does in absorbing & filtering information & making decisions...well...in 'most' drivers... 😉
October 19, 2025 at 4:10 PM
When / where ?
October 19, 2025 at 3:41 PM
The Authorities - as always - have a responsibility to ensure that 'Standards' are high enough.

Take the chance ASAP to have a ride in one.
Initially, you'll be utterly fascinated. Then after a while you'll relax & enjoy the journey, perhaps even falling asleep.

I speak from personal experience.
October 19, 2025 at 3:19 PM
In fact, I'll correct myself slightly - the vehicle is always analysing the data & predicting perhaps dozens of scenarios / decisions - and will take the safest option - it certainly won't take one that incurs risk.

It's literally the fundamental reason for the existence of self-driving tech.
October 19, 2025 at 3:15 PM
The largest number of accidents that have occurred involving self-driving vehicles during their testing so far?

Other people not paying attention to the self-driving vehicle & crashing into it.
October 19, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Again, the whole point is to prevent getting into a situation where there are 2 outcomes.

Avoiding the child will not risk killing anyone - the vehicle slows down & stops well before the situation gets dangerous.
October 19, 2025 at 3:11 PM
And yes, there will be idiots deliberately walking out in front of Self-Driving Vehicles, and they'll try to damage or obscure the sensors, and they'll put obstacles in their way, but they'll soon get bored - or prosecuted.
October 19, 2025 at 3:05 PM
The vehicle suppliers need to be Licenced - so that their vehicles are allowed on the road - so the Licencing Authorities need to ensure that enough rigorous testing has been successfully performed.
October 19, 2025 at 3:03 PM
All decisions are usually made by 2 separate systems, which are then compared, and if there's a discrepancy then - guess what - the vehicle stops.

There are redundant systems (brakes & steering) - which - when they fail or start to fail - signal the vehicle to stop.
October 19, 2025 at 3:01 PM
If it can't 'see' what's happening in front of them (e.g. view is blocked by a truck) then it's still 'looking' at the truck's 'behaviour' & adding that into the mix.
If a ball rolls into the road then the vehicle is programmed to expect a child following to catch it, so it slows down or stops.
October 19, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Self-driving cars analyse data from sensors from 360 degrees around the vehicle thousands of times a second, with a range of a hundred metres or more.
Prediction models are used to judge the chances of any particular situation developing - way way faster than any human.
They take avoiding action.
October 19, 2025 at 2:56 PM
I'm so tired of hearing this.

A fundamental part of self-driving vehicle design philosophy is to ensure that the Trolley Problem will never occur.
October 19, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Reposted by Rolski 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🇩🇪
October 6, 2025 at 8:35 AM