I was starting to think I was the only one having this self-forwarding glitch 😆. @bsky.app really needs to sort it out.

The growth in the number of articles outpaces the growth of the scientific community. Changing policies might address the issue, but can it really make an impact?
Is it possible we’re reaching a critical point and a revolution in scientific publishing practices?

direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...

Do you remember rewinding the tape with a pen? I truly miss how physical the art was, and how hard we had to work sometimes to get access to it. Really made you appreciate things more.

Although reweighted ABSINTH was calibrated based on experimental data, it was not the approach I had in mind.
I believe this manuscript is the perfect answer for my question, thank you!
(and thanks for joining in)

Thank you for the detailed answer!
Do you think that the data from your experimental setup can be directly used to train DNNs, similar to @alexholehouse.bsky.social ALBATROSS, or @lindorfflarsen.bsky.social CALVADOS (which were trained on experimental data but through CG simulations)?

🙋‍♀️

Very interesting paper!
Do you think using only one peptide and mutating it incrementally can suggest additional size-sequence dependencies?

I almost exclusively use ChimeraX, which gives me the FOMO on not figuring out #MolecularNodes