Particularly expand the house. One representative for every 100,000 people, but would vote on-line. Mostly, they would stay at home instead of having to move to Washington. Can be done by Democrats alone when they are in majority in all three branches.
November 10, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Particularly expand the house. One representative for every 100,000 people, but would vote on-line. Mostly, they would stay at home instead of having to move to Washington. Can be done by Democrats alone when they are in majority in all three branches.
His "background" is hugely important in voting for him. His positions on the issues grow out of background, but, perhaps, his religion or ethnicity may not be important based on the strength of his identification with that part of his background. Other parts of his background may be more important.
November 4, 2025 at 11:47 PM
His "background" is hugely important in voting for him. His positions on the issues grow out of background, but, perhaps, his religion or ethnicity may not be important based on the strength of his identification with that part of his background. Other parts of his background may be more important.
Imagine what incriminating horror must be in those Epstein files for the gop to die on this hill and dismantle the USA to protect a 80 year old malignant narcissist.
November 2, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Imagine what incriminating horror must be in those Epstein files for the gop to die on this hill and dismantle the USA to protect a 80 year old malignant narcissist.
It was not just Trump and Epstein it was also Trump and Casablancas and the teen models they groomed and booked for “career building” dinners with older men.
It was not just Trump and Epstein it was also Trump and Casablancas and the teen models they groomed and booked for “career building” dinners with older men.
Check out Justice Eddins’ complete repudiation of the Roberts Court here. It’s worth reading in full. It’s quite brave—and exceedingly rare—for a sitting judge to speak so candidly and scathingly about SCOTUS’ partisan contortions of law, history, and fact. www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/u...
September 20, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Check out Justice Eddins’ complete repudiation of the Roberts Court here. It’s worth reading in full. It’s quite brave—and exceedingly rare—for a sitting judge to speak so candidly and scathingly about SCOTUS’ partisan contortions of law, history, and fact. www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/u...