Shitty workplace. The answer should be have fun!, because we assume you took care of anything urgent, delegated and are a trusted adult who knows how to manage the time without hurting your peers or needing babysitting.
June 17, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Shitty workplace. The answer should be have fun!, because we assume you took care of anything urgent, delegated and are a trusted adult who knows how to manage the time without hurting your peers or needing babysitting.
And one core advantage ? Unlike cheese or Peugeot auto parts, you actually can scale tech companies selling software fast so a tariff may actually create a regional champion fast
April 12, 2025 at 5:21 PM
And one core advantage ? Unlike cheese or Peugeot auto parts, you actually can scale tech companies selling software fast so a tariff may actually create a regional champion fast
The US has a huge service trade surplus. The EU has many incredible startups that just don’t get an opportunity to dethrone the FAANG give the advantages they have because of network effects and first move advantage. A “reciprocal tariff “ would protect them and make them competitive .
April 12, 2025 at 5:21 PM
The US has a huge service trade surplus. The EU has many incredible startups that just don’t get an opportunity to dethrone the FAANG give the advantages they have because of network effects and first move advantage. A “reciprocal tariff “ would protect them and make them competitive .
In theory, this makes sense. In practice, mean tested programs fail because they lose universal support, become too complex to manage and become stigmatizing.
I would say let Bill Gates get his social security check, but do remove the tax cap. making it opt out if people want to avoid the cap.
March 25, 2025 at 3:40 PM
In theory, this makes sense. In practice, mean tested programs fail because they lose universal support, become too complex to manage and become stigmatizing.
I would say let Bill Gates get his social security check, but do remove the tax cap. making it opt out if people want to avoid the cap.
Keeping Teslas off the resale market would starve the secondary market, which is essential to keeping a brand alive. Ensuring they are driven until they become clunkers and end up in junkyards/!: are replaced by other brands would remove them from circulation.
March 20, 2025 at 4:49 AM
Keeping Teslas off the resale market would starve the secondary market, which is essential to keeping a brand alive. Ensuring they are driven until they become clunkers and end up in junkyards/!: are replaced by other brands would remove them from circulation.
From this point of view, the right approach would be for current owners to actually commit to driving it until it’s junk, extracting all the value from it because it’s already been paid for. Also, the logical thing would be to service it elsewhere and avoid any kind of subscription, like FSD.
March 20, 2025 at 4:49 AM
From this point of view, the right approach would be for current owners to actually commit to driving it until it’s junk, extracting all the value from it because it’s already been paid for. Also, the logical thing would be to service it elsewhere and avoid any kind of subscription, like FSD.
of being overpowered, awed, or influenced by its coordinate branches; and that as nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office, this quality may therefore be justly regarded as an indispensable ingredient in its constitution and, in a great
March 19, 2025 at 1:40 AM
of being overpowered, awed, or influenced by its coordinate branches; and that as nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office, this quality may therefore be justly regarded as an indispensable ingredient in its constitution and, in a great
fear from its union with either of the other departments; that as all the effects of such a union must ensue from a dependence of the former on the latter, notwithstanding a nominal and apparent separation; that as, from the natural feebleness of the judiciary, it is in continual jeopardy
March 19, 2025 at 1:40 AM
fear from its union with either of the other departments; that as all the effects of such a union must ensue from a dependence of the former on the latter, notwithstanding a nominal and apparent separation; that as, from the natural feebleness of the judiciary, it is in continual jeopardy