Simple logic says that Starmer should resign. If there's no-one fit to take his place then that speaks volumes about the government running this country.

And that was by design. Which has not played out well for the Labour Party.

As was the decision to block Burnham and then say there's no other alternative to Starmer.

You appear to be saying that absolutely everyone (including yourself) expects the government expects the government to do absolutely everything.

I suspect most people hanker for an ordered reasonable society. But that's only my suspicion.

Bill Clinton made a statement on biotech that seemed to pop the balloon. www.nature.com/articles/nbt...

The thing is Keir Starmer chose not to dwell on those benefits except in passing. I mean, how should people interpret the intentions of a man who says - '“Let me spell it out, you will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID."