It would be nice If you could tell your opinion in a QnA on Edward Luttwak and Geoeconomics.

If by “shit” you mean your ideology you’re right.

I’m sorry but what do you think was the water quality in pre-industrial societies ?

Sorry for understanding economics.

I’m Keynesian,read the general theory,and I’m not the one restarting a debate that ended month ago but sure I’m the psychopath in that conversation.

Funny how you people never stand up to your crazy claims and get frustrated when someone actually do that.

Yes it has objective value.What gives.

No.

I suppose you mean public utility.It’s simply a good that has objective rather then subjective economic value.

They are arguing against that.I’m not.

If we pay Dave then it’s not for free.You’re just making my point dumbass.

I may be retarded but atleast I’m not petty enough to get into arguments that ended 2 month ago.

5 minutes.

I don’t consider people born between 1997 and 2003 to be zoomers.I know they are technically but they are very different.

Maybe read book about Econ and psychology before reading wacky socialist doctrine,Marx did.

What the fuck are you talking,about people answer to incentives,whether they are an individual or in a group,you can only externalized them by making someone else pay,which is what you should be arguing,but no,you’re economically illiterate so you think we can wave a wand and undo human psychology.

WTF of course people had incentives before the industrial era,nobody snap their finger to make it happen,carrying water was a Fucking job en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_c... also have you seen the kind of water they drank back then,have fun going back and catching cholera you moron.

Atleast be original when you are insulting me.

As far as I love human rights the « nature » that you love doesn’t give a shit about them.