let them think that -- redistricting will go reallll well for them with this assumption

that hair tho.

maybe a toilet paper roll holder? seems kind of impractical and small, but surely it isnt actually a cup holder bc yes ... that is vile

wait what. how is that possible.

all i see when i look at cassidy

pacific states of america in the house

*unless determination of cause made by a democratic president should we ever have one again

i suspect they'll just roll with his pretextual for cause argument, saying it's his sole discretion to determine whether there is cause. even if objectively no cause, if pres says there is cause, voila, cause!

omg did piers really post that before seeing? HAAHAHAHAHAH

also a sign he's not so good at probabilities

the thing that sucks is that IF trump doesn't run for a third term, those same 14% will probably just fall back in line for the next republican

lolol "goth poet in deep reflection" cracked me up. thank you.

100%. i have nothing against nuts but they gotta stay in their lane. nuts in brownies, for me, are the ultimate crime.

and here i thought i was alone in my crusade against nuts in baked goods.

see also, texas consistently voting R in presidential elections...

something other than gerrymandering is causing disproportionate election of rs to statewide offices that don't depend on maps.

right but this is still about the maps. what is happening in texas -- if these registration numbers are right -- is the exact opposite of that wisconsin example.

you can't gerrymander a vote that doesn't depend on anything other than who lives in the state. so if these reg numbers are right,

"both have built their careers abusing power" -- agreed, MTG...pam bondi and ed martin have certainly both done that.