I started from a place of assuming there was good science, and ending with a more informed understanding of the issues with science, that psi powers are generally weak, and that they have not been functionally debunked. It was how I spent the entirety of my day...

On the debate around using quantum theory to save psi abilities I found this interesting paper which does not save psi abilities. Instead it says that early life may have had quantum computing power: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... which just blows my mind.

More:

Research showing psi researchers are functionally skeptics: www.frontiersin.org/journals/psy...

Research partially validating the old CIA studies:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37133806/

Paper highlighting effect sizes of psychology papers to set the level: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...

Research showing psi researchers are functionally skeptics: www.frontiersin.org/journals/psy...

Research partially validating the old CIA studies:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37133806/

Paper highlighting effect sizes of psychology papers to set the level: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...

Cardena: Meta-analysis showing the PSI research is solid.
psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-...

Reber & Alcock: Debunking Cardena paper but lacks evidence.
psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-...

Williams rebuttal of Reber and Alcock: Returns to evidence
journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/js...

you can find it online for free.

That’s so…counter productive. Wtf