Riikka Puurunen
@rlpuu.bsky.social
Professor (associate,tenured) at Aalto University, Espoo, Finland (joined 25.10.2023). Interests: atomic layer deposition, catalysis, open science, … Personal account, post are just my humble opinion.
… and not yet, either…
November 13, 2025 at 7:27 AM
… and not yet, either…
Pieni korjaus: olikin jo ke (nyt kun päivitin kirjanpidon).
Siis:
2025, 1612 h, 5.11.
#kokonaistyöaika
#totalworkinghours
Siis:
2025, 1612 h, 5.11.
#kokonaistyöaika
#totalworkinghours
November 7, 2025 at 6:31 AM
Pieni korjaus: olikin jo ke (nyt kun päivitin kirjanpidon).
Siis:
2025, 1612 h, 5.11.
#kokonaistyöaika
#totalworkinghours
Siis:
2025, 1612 h, 5.11.
#kokonaistyöaika
#totalworkinghours
Luulin että jaoit tässä kuvakaappauksen Tere Sammallahden tviitistä - yritin etsiä, en löytänyt. Tämä olikin jonkun ihan muun parodiaa, vai?
October 13, 2025 at 4:08 AM
Luulin että jaoit tässä kuvakaappauksen Tere Sammallahden tviitistä - yritin etsiä, en löytänyt. Tämä olikin jonkun ihan muun parodiaa, vai?
Second example, which just came.
A journal communicated: “If we do not receive your response within four weeks (due date: Oct XX 2025 11:59:59:000PM), we will consider the manuscript withdrawn.” (Actually, we got three weeks!?!)
The statistics get skewed when revisions are sent as new manuscript.
A journal communicated: “If we do not receive your response within four weeks (due date: Oct XX 2025 11:59:59:000PM), we will consider the manuscript withdrawn.” (Actually, we got three weeks!?!)
The statistics get skewed when revisions are sent as new manuscript.
October 9, 2025 at 5:42 AM
Second example, which just came.
A journal communicated: “If we do not receive your response within four weeks (due date: Oct XX 2025 11:59:59:000PM), we will consider the manuscript withdrawn.” (Actually, we got three weeks!?!)
The statistics get skewed when revisions are sent as new manuscript.
A journal communicated: “If we do not receive your response within four weeks (due date: Oct XX 2025 11:59:59:000PM), we will consider the manuscript withdrawn.” (Actually, we got three weeks!?!)
The statistics get skewed when revisions are sent as new manuscript.
In one example this year, we had to indeed withdraw the manuscript and submit as new, because referee comments (round 2) came in the summer, and it was impossible to respond in three or three +1 weeks, because people were on vacation at different times. Revision 2 thus submitted as "new manuscript".
October 9, 2025 at 5:39 AM
In one example this year, we had to indeed withdraw the manuscript and submit as new, because referee comments (round 2) came in the summer, and it was impossible to respond in three or three +1 weeks, because people were on vacation at different times. Revision 2 thus submitted as "new manuscript".
Apparently, a problem came about on Thu (yesterday), and the autohgenerated captions have been disabled. I had my lecture on that unfortunate day, when these captions were automatically pushed.
Looking forward to improvements...
Looking forward to improvements...
September 5, 2025 at 7:57 AM
Apparently, a problem came about on Thu (yesterday), and the autohgenerated captions have been disabled. I had my lecture on that unfortunate day, when these captions were automatically pushed.
Looking forward to improvements...
Looking forward to improvements...
Solution - thanks to help I got in Aalto Marsio - from settings related to the Panopto video, choose captions, and delete the Finnish captions.
Huh! Now I can share the video with students.
Huh! Now I can share the video with students.
September 5, 2025 at 7:56 AM
Solution - thanks to help I got in Aalto Marsio - from settings related to the Panopto video, choose captions, and delete the Finnish captions.
Huh! Now I can share the video with students.
Huh! Now I can share the video with students.
"auto generated transript" apparently was responsible. now, how to get rid of it...
September 4, 2025 at 11:29 AM
"auto generated transript" apparently was responsible. now, how to get rid of it...