shirk hard gay hard
riotstarz.bsky.social
shirk hard gay hard
@riotstarz.bsky.social
Queer communism with pretty much anything but perpetual fascist dystopia as a transitional demand. Glasgow.
That's a cavewoman, thanks very much, and yet still infinitely more self aware, well informed and worldly than you.
November 20, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Why does no one like any of your replies, little one? Why does no one like you? Why do you think the person everyone else recognises as ridiculous and deeply racist has the authority to talk about other people's bravado and stupidity?
November 20, 2025 at 7:55 PM
You've been ratioed to fuck on every reply because literally everyone can see you're a piece of shit, tiny man.
November 20, 2025 at 7:41 PM
ooh it's full nazi sealion time!

fuck off.
November 20, 2025 at 6:59 PM
aight fair play to him, I've seen its invocation a lot more than I have his own words
November 20, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Godwin's Law gives us a similar lesson: the meaning of "never again" is that nothing comparable to historical fascism could ever happen again, and therefore it should never be mentioned.
November 20, 2025 at 2:18 PM
"it is a fixable problem but we just have to accept the fix is nazi-scale eugenics, because supply and demand are the only true laws of the universe and there are just too many people out there, which is the cause of all these countries' problems"
November 20, 2025 at 11:59 AM
look ludwig von mises has proven that slavery is unavoidable and necessary, specifically in places where people's tiny brains make them have too many kids, and if you mess with that natural order of things and don't buy enough slave clothing those tragic tiny-brained people will just starve
November 20, 2025 at 11:57 AM
lol yes this belief is consistent with the profound racism in your replies on other threads bsky.app/profile/alex...
November 20, 2025 at 11:19 AM
November 20, 2025 at 10:52 AM
no no they're regrettable, they're just part of the natural order of things and any opposition to them can only make things worse. if you think about it, you should *specifically* support sweatshops because you're keeping the most vulnerable people employed
November 20, 2025 at 10:45 AM
yes, I can see why you'd say that, the absolute scum of the earth have been making this argument for any labour protections and inhuman conditions for centuries.
November 20, 2025 at 10:32 AM
is this the "it is difficult to get someone to understand something if their livelihood depends on not understanding it"? yeah, pretty much, albeit a huge swathe of the public is just embracing it for funsies
November 19, 2025 at 12:15 PM
almost nothing about contemporary fascism and its liberal enablement has any coherence without considering immigrants/racialised ppl/trans ppl/disabled ppl/ppl on benefits/palestinians/many other groups as less than fully human.
November 19, 2025 at 12:00 PM
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
November 17, 2025 at 11:18 PM
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
November 17, 2025 at 11:11 PM
To the extent that near all mainstreamish media involves such ppl. I just don't think anyone's justified in being too self-congratulatory about it. Everyone I know has cut Gaiman out, sure, but most of the above aren't just tolerated but often adored by the same people. It's... complicated, at best.
November 16, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Tbc "you" in my initial skeet was universal, not aimed at you. Idk idt I'm reading more in, like I never implied cutting out anyone who buys Gaiman. But "materially supporting genocide" or "signing petitions supporting a child rapist" are well beyond that, & these are *endemic* in public figures.
November 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM
If you have capacity to read and would like to, here is the chapter: drive.google.com/file/d/1YyPe... It is absolutely beautifully clear and researched.
Juno Mac and Molly Smith - Revolting Prostitutes chapter 3 - Borders.pdf
drive.google.com
November 16, 2025 at 10:52 AM
Tryna get a copy of the Revolting Prostitutes chapter on trafficking/"trafficking", which is absolutely stellar on this. But it's like with drugs - if you criminalise, of course you end up with terribly-motivated people involved, and you get a "war on drugs" that causes huge harms.
November 16, 2025 at 10:29 AM
I get you but I do think it's important to stress that the proportion of good to bad people involved in facilitating travel doesn't change that policy focused on fighting them will, and does, lead to *more* people dying at sea - this is very well evidenced.
November 16, 2025 at 10:26 AM