Who benefits? Certainly not the kind of people we want in our government, or in possession of lots of property: vigilantes. putschists. When people are encouraged to express their dislike of someone with vandalism and violence like Kristallnacht, or the Euromaidan, the result is always horrible.

Justin Trudeau is a loyal British subject, lying for his terrible king, who visited his colony, Canada, a few years ago, before his mother, Queen Liz II died, to lie that "Putin is just like Hitler."

Right. The aggressor is the U.S.A. and its accomplices, especially the UK, which is infuriated that the U.S.A. is backing down. The victims are both Ukraine and Russia: Ukraine the Nazi coup victim, then cannon fodder, and Russia the target.

POTUS Trump stopped supporting the Nazi regime that Obama brought to power, but never fully admitted that it was a Russia-hating Nazi regime that drove Russian-speaking parts of Ukraine to secede and join Russia. Meanwhile, Trump continues to support an older Nazi regime called Israel.

The double standard is there, not because Zelensky is virtuous, but because the US is worse, funding a Nazi coup against Ukraine in Feb. 2014 AND NEVER ADMITTING OR REPENTING OF IT!

Zelensky is a big liar, and a coward in the face of the Nazis that took over his country. But then, it takes extraordinary courage to face Nazis when they have all the money, all foreign, from US/UK, or looted, and your patriots have none. Zelensky joined the Nazis & got money.

Not a fan of Musk or X or Trump. But you can't beat moneybags by indiscriminately attacking their every move. You must identify the common aims of mankind that are being violated, and provide an alternative that serves the common aims of mankind.

He's right to exclude Reuters and AP. They're not interested in the truth, which was reported by EIR 11 years ago and ever since: Ukraine's government was violently overthrown in Feb. 2014 with $$ from USAID, Soros, other Westerners, to install a Russia-hating Nazi regime!

The ideas he bought really aren't that smart. But Americans assume that if a lot of private money is being invested in something, it must be smart, because he who makes money must be smart, because we're too smart to let them waste our money!

Plenty of rare earth minerals in U.S. territory, but enviro regs. and radiophobia (these minerals usually also contain thorium and/or uranium) make them uneconomical to process. Graphite is purified coal--again, enviro regs, not availability.

Nothing more vile than British imperial propaganda!

Freedom for Ukraine would be to undo the 2014 Obama-coup, allowing ousted President Yanukovych, Natalia Vitrenko and Viktor Marchenko and many others to return to Ukrainian politics!

No, Ukraine started it, by attacking its own Russian-speaking people, driving them to secede. But Ukraine didn't do this on its own; it was conquered by the US/UK in a coup in 2014, its democratically elected president Yanukovych unlawfully and violently ousted!

In truth, all of them, except for FDR are/were lackeys of financial elites. Trump is so far a lackey of Miriam Adelson, stopping one mad war (against Russia) but escalating another (the Greater Israel Crusade)

Windmills and solar panels must gather very diffuse, intermittent energy from the great outdoors. This exposure to weather, insects, etc. over huge areas per quantity of power, makes for high maintenance cost and low life span. And they require massive energy storage to do anything useful.

But we need the energy! With 8 billion+ people, we can't live like savages; 7.99 billion will die if we do that, for lack of food and bio-security! We need to become extraterrestrial! Even nuclear, the way we're doing it, is not enough; see my article: larouchepub.com/other/2021/4...

Fossil fuel pollution is still better than what is usually pushed as the alternative: wind, solar, Li-ion batteries (big fire hazard! super-toxic smoke!), biofuels (either smoke or lots of messy chemical refining)--or just denial of energy to entire nations, whose effect is as cruel as starvation.

I say we all have the right to use, for peaceful purposes, both nuclear fuels and fossil fuels. Nuclear fuels have an overwhelming > 10^6 advantage in energy density, but cannot, at present, be used cost-effectively for some things, because of the radiation shielding requirements.